Additive energetic contributions of multiple peptide positions determine the relative promiscuity of viral and human sequences for PDZ domain targets
E. F. Tahti, J. M. Blount, S. N. Jackson, M. Gao, N. P. Gill, S. N. Smith, N. J. Pederson, S. N. Rumph, S. A. Struyvenberg, I. G. P. Mackley, D. R. Madden, J. Amacher
Abstract
Protein-protein interactions that include recognition of short sequences of amino acids, or peptides, are critical in cellular processes. Protein-peptide interaction surface areas are relatively small and shallow, and there are often overlapping specificities in families of peptide-binding domains. Therefore, dissecting selectivity determinants can be challenging. PDZ domains are an example of a peptide-binding domain located in several intracellular signaling and trafficking pathways, which form interactions critical for the regulation of receptor endocytic trafficking, tight junction formation, organization of supramolecular complexes in neurons, and other biological systems. These domains are also directly targeted by pathogens, and a hallmark of many oncogenic viral proteins is a PDZ-binding motif. However, amidst sequences that target PDZ domains, there is a wide spectrum in relative promiscuity. For example, the viral HPV16 E6 oncoprotein recognizes over double the number of PDZ domain-containing proteins as the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) in the cell, despite similar PDZ targeting-sequences and identical motif residues. Here, we determine binding affinities for PDZ domains known to bind either HPV16 E6 alone or both CFTR and HPV16 E6, using peptides matching WT and hybrid sequences. We also use energy minimization to model PDZ-peptide complexes and use sequence analyses to investigate this difference. We find that while the majority of single mutations had a marginal effect on overall affinity, the additive effect on the free energy of binding accurately describes the selectivity observed. Taken together, our results describe how complex and differing PDZ interactomes can be programmed in the cell.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Sequence engineering at non-motif modulator residues yields a peptide that effectively targets a single PDZ protein in a disease-relevant cellular context
Jeanine F. Amacher, Patrick R. Cushing, … Dean R. Madden·Journal of Molecular BiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 17, 2025
- The human PDZome 2.0: characterization of a new resource to test for PDZ interactions by Yeast Two-Hybrid
Monica Castro-Cruz, Frédérique Lembo, … Pascale Zimmermann·MembranesPeer-reviewed·Aug 17, 2023
- Quantitative fragmentomics allow affinity mapping of interactomes
Gergő Gógl, Boglárka Zámbó, … Gilles Travé·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Sep 17, 2022
- Structural basis of internal peptide recognition by PDZ domains using molecular dynamics simulations
Neetu Sain, Debasisa Mohanty·bioRxiv·Mar 14, 2019
- Interactomic affinity profiling by holdup assay: acetylation and distal residues impact the PDZome-binding specificity of PTEN phosphatase
- Protein context shapes the specificity of domain-peptide interactions in vivo
Ugo Dionne, Émilie Bourgault, … Christian R. Landry·bioRxiv·May 18, 2020