Hydration Energetics Shape Antibody Discrimination between Sulfotyrosine and Phosphotyrosine
Takahiro MoriiD, Kotaro Yahagi, Saki MaruokaiD, Kota Toyoda, Yoshikazu Sonoshita, Yohei KametaniiD, Yoshihito ShiotaiD, Kazunari YoshizawaiD, Keiichi WatanabeiD, Kyo Okazaki, Yoshihiro KobashigawaiD, Hiroshi MoriokaiD, Hideki HirakawaiD, Etsuko NishimotoiD, Takamasa TeramotoiD, Yoshimitsu KakutaiD
Abstract
Chemically similar post-translational modifications can mediate distinct biological functions, but how proteins distinguish between them remains unclear. Sulfotyrosine (sTyr) and phosphotyrosine (pTyr) exemplify this problem because they have similar sizes, local geometries, and electrostatic properties but function in different biological contexts. Here, we used the monoclonal antibody PSG2, which recognizes sTyr independently of the surrounding peptide sequence, to examine how a protein distinguishes these modifications. The crystal structure of PSG2 bound to an sTyr-containing peptide revealed a deep electropositive pocket with no modeled water molecules in direct contact with the sulfate group. Gas-phase density functional theory calculations favored pTyr over sTyr, showing that direct protein-ligand interactions alone are insufficient to explain PSG2 selectivity. Explicit first-shell hydration calculations showed that pTyr has a larger desolvation penalty than sTyr, and accounting for this difference reversed the calculated energetic order. Isothermal titration calorimetry showed favorable enthalpic and entropic contributions to sTyr binding, whereas no detectable heat signal was observed for pTyr. These results show that PSG2 distinguishes sTyr from pTyr through the balance between direct protein-ligand interactions and ligand desolvation.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Discriminating changes in protein structure using PTAD conjugation to tyrosine
M. Moinpour, N. K. Barker, … J. C. Schwartz·bioRxiv·Feb 4, 2020
- An Inherent Structural Difference Between Serine and Threonine Phosphorylation: Phosphothreonine Prefers an Ordered, Compact, Cyclic Conformation
A. K. Pandey, H. K. Ganguly, … N. J. Zondlo·bioRxiv·Feb 29, 2020
- Uncovering Differences in Hydration Free Energies and Structures for Model Compound Mimics of Charged Sidechains of Amino Acids
M. J. Fossat, X. Zeng, R. V. Pappu·bioRxiv·Feb 4, 2021
- Role of Tyrosine Phosphorylation in PTP-PEST
S. T S, A. Manikandan, … S. Vemparala·bioRxiv·Nov 28, 2023
- A bespoke analytical workflow for the confident identification of sulfopeptides and their discrimination from phosphopeptides
L. A. Daly, D. P. Byrne, … C. E. Eyers·bioRxiv·Jul 15, 2023
- Evolutionary Divergence in the Conformational Landscapes of Tyrosine vs Serine/Threonine Kinases
J. Gizzio, A. Thakur, … R. M. Levy·bioRxiv·Aug 29, 2022