bioRxivBiophysics
An Inherent Structural Difference Between Serine and Threonine Phosphorylation: Phosphothreonine Prefers an Ordered, Compact, Cyclic Conformation
A. K. Pandey, H. K. Ganguly, S. K. Sinha, K. E. Daniels, G. P. A. Yap, S. Patel, N. J. Zondlo
Abstract
Phosphorylation and dephosphorylation of proteins by kinases and phosphatases are central to cellular responses and function. The structural effects of serine and threonine phosphorylation were examined in peptides and in proteins, by circular dichroism, NMR spectroscopy, bioinformatics analysis of the PDB, small-molecule X-ray crystallography, and computational investigations. Phosphorylation of both serine and threonine residues induces substantial conformational restriction in their physiologically more important dianionic forms. Threonine exhibits a particularly strong disorder-to-order transition upon phosphorylation, with dianionic phosphothreonine preferentially adopting a cyclic conformation with restricted{phi} ({phi} [~] -60{degrees}) stabilized by three noncovalent interactions: a strong intraresidue phosphate-amide hydrogen bond, an n[->]{pi}* interaction between consecutive carbonyls, and an n[->]{sigma}* interaction between the phosphate O{gamma} lone pair and the antibonding orbital of C-H{beta} that restricts the{chi} 2 side chain conformation. Proline is unique among the canonical amino acids for its covalent cyclization on the backbone. Phosphothreonine can mimic prolines backbone cyclization via noncovalent interactions. The preferred torsions of dianionic phosphothreonine are{phi} ,{psi} = polyproline helix or -helix ({phi} [~] -60{degrees});{chi} 1 = g-;{chi} 2 = eclipsed C-H/O-P bonds. This structural signature is observed in diverse proteins, including the activation loops of protein kinases and protein-protein interactions. In total, these results suggest a structural basis for the differential use and evolution of threonine versus serine phosphorylation sites in proteins, with serine phosphorylation typically inducing smaller, rheostat-like changes, versus threonine phosphorylation promoting larger, step function-like switches, in proteins.
- assay: protein structure
- research focus: protein folding & dynamics
- approach: experimental assay
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Effects of phosphorylation on protein backbone dynamics and conformational preferences
David Bickel, Wim Vranken·Journal of Chemical Theory and ComputationPeer-reviewed·Jun 3, 2024
- α-Helix stabilization by co-operative side chain charge-reinforced interactions to phosphoserine in a basic kinase-substrate motif
M. Batchelor, R. S. Dawber, … R. Bayliss·bioRxiv·Nov 27, 2021
- Global comparative structural analysis of responses to protein phosphorylation
Miguel Correa Marrero, Victor Hugo Mello, … Pedro Beltrão·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Oct 24, 2025
- Evolutionary sequence and structural basis for the distinct conformational landscapes of Tyr and Ser/Thr kinases
- Molecular simulations of enzymatic phosphorylation of disordered proteins and their condensates
Emanuele Zippo, Dorothee Dormann, … Lukas S. Stelzl·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·May 19, 2025
- ERK Allosteric Activation: The Importance of Two Ordered Phosphorylation Events
Clil Regev, Hyunbum Jang, Ruth Nussinov·Journal of Molecular BiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 9, 2025