henhaobio
Sign in

bioRxivMolecular BiologyPreprint

Loop extrusion dynamics and cooperative activation independently regulate enhancer-driven transcription

Elias T. FrimaniD, Hannah J JuelligiD, Grace AlstoniD, Luciana I. Gómez AcuñaiD, Shelagh Boyle, Milena Flankova, Alba Muñoz Grande, Giovanna WeykopfiD, Anita Mann, Iain WilliamsoniD, Laura A. LetticeiD, Wendy A. BickmoreiD

PDFDOI
Citations
1

Abstract

How enhancers transmit their activation signals to target promoters is a fundamental unanswered question. Gene activation by distal enhancers is affected by the three-dimensional organisation of chromatin driven by cohesin-mediated loop extrusion, but how the dynamic loop extrusion cycle shapes transcriptional outcomes is not fully understood. In addition, genes are typically regulated by multiple enhancers and cases of cooperativity between enhancers have been observed that depend on the relative position of enhancers and gene. The reason for such context-dependent cooperativity is unknown, and whether it is linked to loop extrusion has not been explored. Here, we use synthetic gene activation to show that NIPBL depletion, which decreases loop extrusion rate, reduces long-range activation in a dose-dependent manner. In contrast, WAPL depletion, which reduces cohesin turnover, can both increase and decrease distal gene activation depending on the presence of adjacent CTCF binding sites. These effects on gene activation correlate with the impact on chromatin contacts. Depletion of the co-activator BRD4 also affects long-range activation, but not by changing chromatin contacts. Synthetic activation from two locations results in super-additive responses, which can be predicted by an independently determined response model. These predictions hold for dual activation from proximal and/or distal sites, and with perturbed NIPBL, WAPL, or BRD4. Distal activation therefore appears to be equivalent in nature to proximal activation, and context-dependent cooperativity can arise simply from different level of activation inputs operating on a non-linear response function.

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISPopay '26Ubertini '25Banigan '23Földes '26Kane '21Choppakatla '26
73% semantic matchMolecular Biology
Tessa M. Popay, Ami Pant, Femke W. Munting+4 more·Nature Genetics·Feb 16, 2026· 15 citations