Towards a gold standard for benchmarking gene set enrichment analysis
Ludwig GeistlingeriD, Gergely CsabaiD, Mara SantarelliiD, Marcel RamosiD, Lucas SchifferiD, Nitesh TuragaiD, Charity W. LawiD, Sean R. DavisiD, Vincent J. CareyiD, Martin T. MorganiD, Ralf ZimmeriD, Levi WaldroniD
Abstract
BackgroundAlthough gene set enrichment analysis has become an integral part of high-throughput gene expression data analysis, the assessment of enrichment methods remains rudimentary and ad hoc. In the absence of suitable gold standards, evaluations are commonly restricted to selected data sets and biological reasoning on the relevance of resulting enriched gene sets. However, this is typically incomplete and biased towards the goals of individual investigations.\n\nResultsWe present a general framework for standardized and structured benchmarking of enrichment methods based on defined criteria for applicability, gene set prioritization, and detection of relevant processes. This framework incorporates a curated compendium of 75 expression data sets investigating 42 different human diseases. The compendium features microarray and RNA-seq measurements, and each dataset is associated with a precompiled GO/KEGG relevance ranking for the corresponding disease under investigation. We perform a comprehensive assessment of 10 major enrichment methods on the benchmark compendium, identifying significant differences in (i) runtime and applicability to RNA-seq data, (ii) fraction of enriched gene sets depending on the type of null hypothesis tested, and (iii) recovery of the a priori defined relevance rankings. Based on these findings, we make practical recommendations on (i) how methods originally developed for microarray data can efficiently be applied to RNA-seq data, (ii) how to interpret results depending on the type of gene set test conducted, and (iii) which methods are best suited to effectively prioritize gene sets with high relevance for the phenotype investigated.\n\nConclusionWe carried out a systematic assessment of existing enrichment methods, and identified best performing methods, but also general shortcomings in how gene set analysis is currently conducted. We provide a directly executable benchmark system for straightforward assessment of additional enrichment methods.\n\nAvailabilityhttp://bioconductor.org/packages/GSEABenchmarkeR
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 139
- FWCI
- 5.05
- Field percentile
- top 3%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Benchmarking enrichment analysis methods with the disease pathway network
Davide Buzzao, Miguel Castresana-Aguirre, … Erik L. L. Sonnhammer·Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 22, 2024
- Assessment of Gene Set Enrichment Analysis using curated RNA-seq-based benchmarks
Julián Candia, Luigi Ferrucci·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·May 16, 2024
- Combining multiple tools outperforms individual methods in gene set enrichment analyses
Monther Alhamdoosh, Milica Ng, … Matthew E. Ritchie·bioRxiv·Jul 8, 2016
- Fast gene set enrichment analysis
Gennady Korotkevich, Vladimir Sukhov, … Alexey Sergushichev·bioRxiv·Feb 1, 2021
- Concise functional enrichment of ranked gene lists
Xinglin Jia, An Phan, Claus Kadelka·bioRxiv·Jun 30, 2023
- Using predictive specificity to determine when gene set analysis is biologically meaningful
Sara Ballouz, Paul Pavlidis, Jesse A Gillis·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Oct 11, 2016