henhaobio
Sign in

NatureSystems BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article

The social architecture of an in-depth cellular protein interactome

André C. MichaelisiD, Andreas‐David BrunneriD, Maximilian ZwiebeliD, Florian MeieriD, Maximilian T. StraussiD, Isabell BludauiD, Matthias ManniD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Nearly all cellular functions are mediated by protein-protein interactions and mapping the interactome provides fundamental insights into the regulation and structure of biological systems. In principle, affinity purification coupled to mass spectrometry (AP-MS) is an ideal and scalable tool, however, it has been difficult to identify low copy number complexes, membrane complexes and those disturbed by protein-tagging. As a result, our current knowledge of the interactome is far from complete, and assessing the reliability of reported interactions is challenging. Here we develop a sensitive, high-throughput, and highly reproducible AP-MS technology combined with a quantitative two-dimensional analysis strategy for comprehensive interactome mapping of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We reduced required cell culture volumes thousand-fold and employed 96-well formats throughout, allowing replicate analysis of the endogenous green fluorescent protein (GFP) tagged library covering the entire expressed yeast proteome. The 4159 pull-downs generated a highly structured network of 3,909 proteins connected by 29,710 interactions. Compared to previous large-scale studies, we double the number of proteins (nodes in the network) and triple the number of reliable interactions (edges), including very low abundant epigenetic complexes, organellar membrane complexes and non-taggable complexes interfered by abundance correlation. This nearly saturated interactome reveals that the vast majority of yeast proteins are highly connected, with an average of 15 interactors, the majority of them unreported so far. Similar to social networks between humans, the average shortest distance is 4.2 interactions. A web portal (www.yeast-interactome.org) enables exploration of our dataset by the network and biological communities and variations of our AP-MS technology can be employed in any organism or dynamic conditions.

Citations
119
FWCI
10.46
Field percentile
top 1%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISYounger '17Skinnider '18Lambourne '21Fenech '23Liu '18Nissley '26
64% semantic matchSynthetic Biology
David A. Younger, Stephanie Berger, David A. Baker+1 more·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences·Oct 31, 2017· 85 citations