henhaobio
Sign in

G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article

Systematic analysis of the effects of the DNA damage response network in telomere defective budding yeast

Eva−Maria HolsteiniD, Hien-Ping NgoiD, Conor LawlessiD, Peter BanksiD, Matthew GreethamiD, Darren J. WilkinsoniD, David A. LydalliD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Functional telomeres are critically important to eukaryotic genetic stability. Budding yeast is a powerful model organism for genetic analysis and yeast telomeres are maintained by very similar mechanisms to human telomeres. Scores of proteins and pathways are known to affect telomere function. Here, we report a series of related genome-wide genetic interaction screens performed on budding yeast cells with acute or chronic telomere defects. We examined genetic interactions in cells defective in Cdc13 and Stn1, affecting two components of CST, a single stranded DNA (ssDNA) binding complex that binds telomeric DNA. We investigated genetic interactions in cells with defects in Rfa3, affecting the major ssDNA binding protein, RPA, which has overlapping functions with CST at telomeres. We also examined genetic interactions in cells lacking EXO1 or RAD9, affecting different aspects of the DNA damage response in a cdc13-1 background. Comparing fitness profiles across the data sets allows us build up a picture of the specific responses to different types of dysfunctional telomeres. Our results show that there is no universal response to telomere defects. To help others engage with the large volumes of data we make the data available via two interactive web-based tools: Profilyzer and DIXY. Among numerous genetic interactions we found the chk1{Delta} mutation improved fitness of cdc13-1 exo1{Delta} cells more than other checkpoint mutations (ddc1{Delta}, rad9{Delta}, rad17{Delta}, rad24{Delta}), whereas in cdc13-1 cells the effects of all checkpoint mutations were similar. We find that Chk1 stimulates resection at defective telomeres, revealing a new role for Chk1 in the eukaryotic DNA damage response network.

Citations
5
FWCI
0.33
Field percentile
top 45%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISGrandin '24Feng '25Nickens '25Langston '20Rodrigues '18Yu '26
70% semantic matchMolecular Biology
Nathalie Grandin, Michel Charbonneau·Cells·Sep 25, 2024· 1 citations