BioinformaticsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
ALPINE: A Scalable Pipeline for Comprehensive Classification of Gene-Editing Outcomes from Long-Read Amplicon Sequencing
Yu Chen, Xing‐Huang GaoiD, Athea VichasiD, Jianbin Wang, Ryan Golhar, Isaac Neuhaus
Abstract
CRISPR genome editing has enabled precise genetic modification for gene and cell therapies, but edits often produce heterogeneous on-target outcomes, including homology-directed repair (HDR) knock-ins, DNA repair template integrations, and structural variants. Existing tools are frequently limited to short reads or lack viral vector-specific integration categories needed for therapeutic development. Here, we present ALPINE (Amplicon Long-read Pipeline for INtegration Evaluation), a scalable and reproducible pipeline for classifying and quantifying gene-editing outcomes from long-read amplicon sequencing. ALPINE classifies reads into 10+ categories, including DNA repair vector integration subtypes, and performs variant calling near the gene-edited site with batch, multi-sample reporting. Uniquely, ALPINE can distinguish between cells treated with multiple DNA repair vectors and identify distinct molecular features, such as inverted terminal repeats (ITRs), enabling comprehensive characterization of complex gene editing outcomes. Benchmarking on simulated datasets showed high accuracy, and application to edited T cell samples demonstrated comprehensive gene-editing outcome profiling. Supplementary data are available online. AvailabilityALPINE is implemented in Python and distributed as Docker containers with Common Workflow Language (CWL) support for cloud deployment. The pipeline is available under MIT license at https://github.com/Maggi-Chen/ALPINE.
- assay: long-read sequencing
- research focus: variant calling
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: software / tool
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 44th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Analyzing long-read CRISPR experiments with CRISPRLungo
Gue‐Ho Hwang, Benjamin Vyshedskiy, … Luca Pinello·bioRxiv·Oct 21, 2025
- Accurate analysis of genuine CRISPR editing events with ampliCan
Kornel Labun, Xiaoge Guo, … Eivind Valen·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2019
- GREPore-seq: A Robust Workflow to Detect Changes after Gene Editing through Long-range PCR and Nanopore Sequencing
Zi-Jun Quan, Si-Ang Li, … Xiao‐Bing Zhang·Genomics Proteomics & BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 22, 2022
- Cell-stereotyped DNA repair outcomes are widespread during genome editing
Moritz F. Schlapansky, Markus Schröder, … Jacob E. Corn·bioRxiv·Oct 23, 2025
- CRISPR-Analytics (CRISPR-A): a platform for precise analytics and simulations for gene editing
Marta Sanvicente-García, Albert García-Valiente, … Marc Güell·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·May 30, 2023
- Inference of CRISPR Edits from Sanger Trace Data
Tim Hsiau, David Conant, … Rich Stoner·bioRxiv·Aug 10, 2019