A method for authenticating the fidelity of Cryptococcus neoformans knockout collections
Ella JacobsiD, Quigly DragotakesiD, Madhura KulkarniiD, Kimberly Kuhn, Ao Shen, Amanda DziedziciD, Anne JedlickaiD, J. Marie HardwickiD, Arturo CasadevalliD
Abstract
Gene knockout strain collections are important tools for discovery in microbiology. Cryptococcus neoformans is the only human pathogenic fungus with an available genome-wide deletion collection, and this resource is widely used by the research community. We uncovered mix-ups in the assembly of the commercially available C. neoformans deletion collection of [~]6,000 unique strains acquired by our lab. While pursuing the characterization of a gene-of-interest, the corresponding deletion strain from the C. neoformans KO collection displayed several interesting phenotypes associated with virulence. However, RNAseq analysis identified transcripts for the putative knockout gene, and the absence of transcripts for a different knockout strain found in the same plate position in an earlier partial knockout collection, raising the possibility that plates from one collection were substituted for the other. This was supported by determining the size of the nourseothricin (NAT)-resistance cassette used to generate the two separate knockout libraries and was confirmed by RNAseq and genome sequencing. Here we report that our KN99 collection is comprised of mixed plates from two independent KO libraries and present a simple authentication method that other investigators can use to distinguish the identities of these KO collections. ImportanceGene knockout strain collections are important tools for discovery in microbiology. Cryptococcus neoformans is the only human pathogenic fungus with an available genome-wide deletion collection, and this resource is widely used by the research community. Here we report that our KN99 collection is comprised of mixed plates from two independent KO libraries and present a simple authentication method that other investigators can use to distinguish the identities of these KO collections. Above all, this article serves as a reminder to 2015 library collection strains before undertaking large phenotyping experiments.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 25th percentile
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Identification of pathogen genomic differences that impact human immune response and disease during Cryptococcus neoformans infection
Aleeza C. Gerstein, Katrina M. Jackson, … Kirsten Nielsen·mBioPeer-reviewed·Jul 15, 2019
- The pangenome of the human fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans reveals that subtelomeres are hotspots for gene content variation
Claire E Reichardt, R. Blake Billmyre·bioRxiv·Oct 28, 2026
- Short homology-directed repair using optimized Cas9 in the pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans enables rapid gene deletion and tagging
M. Y. Huang, M. B. Joshi, … H. D. Madhani·bioRxiv·Jun 30, 2021
- Near 100% efficient homology-dependent genome engineering in the human fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans
Matthew J. Nalley, Sanjita Banerjee, … Hiten D. Madhani·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 3, 2025
- Hybrid Genome Sequence of Cryptococcus neoformans of Indian origin and comparative genome analysis
Jananishree Sathiyamoorthy, Jayapradha Ramakrishnan·bioRxiv·Aug 22, 2024
- Simple Growth Conditions Improve Targeted Gene Deletion in Cryptococcus neoformans
Rebekah G. Watson, Camaron R. Hole·mSpherePeer-reviewed·Apr 2, 2025