GeneticsGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Genetic screens identify multiple negative regulators that additively restrict recruitment of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeler to the HO promoter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Abstract
Activation of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae HO promoter is highly regulated, requiring the ordered recruitment of activators and coactivators and allowing production of only a few transcripts in mother cells within a short cell cycle window. We conducted genetic screens to identify the negative regulators of HO expression necessary to limit HO transcription. Known repressors of HO (Ash1 and Rpd3) were identified, as well as several additional chromatin-associated factors including the Hda1 histone deacetylase, the Isw2 chromatin remodeler, and the corepressor Tup1. We also identified clusters of HO promoter mutations that suggested roles for the Dot6/Tod6 (PAC site) and Ume6 repression pathways. We used ChIP assays with synchronized cells to validate the involvement of these factors and map the association of Ash1, Dot6, and Ume6 with the HO promoter to a brief window in the cell cycle between binding of the initial activating transcription factor and initiation of transcription. We found that Ash1 and Ume6 each recruit the Rpd3 histone deacetylase to HO, and their effects are additive. In contrast, Rpd3 was not recruited significantly to the PAC site, suggesting this site has a distinct mechanism for repression. Increases in HO expression and SWI/SNF recruitment were all additive upon loss of Ash1, Ume6, and PAC site factors, indicating the convergence of independent pathways for repression. Our results demonstrate that multiple protein complexes are important for limiting the spread of SWI/SNF mediated nucleosome eviction across the HO promoter, suggesting that regulation requires a delicate balance of activities that promote and repress transcription.
- organism: yeast
- assay: ChIP-seq
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 7
- FWCI
- 0.50
- Field percentile
- top 42%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Ash1 and Tup1 Dependent Repression of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae HO promoter Requires Activator-Dependent Nucleosome Eviction
Emily J. Parnell, Timothy J. Parnell, … David J. Stillman·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 31, 2020
- SWI/SNF antagonizes SIR heterochromatin to promote transcription of genes expressed during mitotic exit in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Mayuri Rege, Jessica L. Feldman, … Craig L. Peterson·bioRxiv·Mar 24, 2020
- Independent Recruitment of the Mediator Tail Module to the HO Promoter Suggests Mediator Core Limits Coactivator Recruitment in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Robert M. Yarrington, Yaxin Yu, … David J. Stillman·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 23, 2020
- Acetylation-Dependent Recruitment of the FACT Complex and Its Role in Regulating Pol II Occupancy Genome-Wide in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Rakesh Pathak, Priyanka Singh, … Chhabi K. Govind·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 25, 2018
- SWI/SNF coordinates transcriptional activation through Rpd3-mediated histone hypoacetylation during quiescence entry
Marla M. Spain, Keean C. A. Braceros, Toshio Tsukiyama·bioRxiv·Sep 26, 2018
- The SWI/SNF and RSC Cooperatively Remodel the Promoters of Unfolded Protein Response Targets and Heat Shock Genes
Rakesh Kumar Sahu, Sakshi Singh, Raghuvir Singh Tomar·Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory MechanismsPeer-reviewed·Aug 25, 2021