Solvent Precipitation SP3 (SP4) enhances recovery for proteomics sample preparation without magnetic beads
H. E. Johnston, K. Yadav, J. M. Kirkpatrick, G. S. Biggs, D. Oxley, H. B. Kramer, R. S. Samant
Abstract
Complete, reproducible extraction of protein material is essential for comprehensive and unbiased proteome analyses. A current gold standard is single-pot, solid-phase-enhanced sample preparation (SP3), in which organic solvent and magnetic beads are used to denature and capture proteins, with subsequently washes allowing contaminant removal. However, SP3 is dependent on effective protein immobilisation onto beads, risks losses during wash steps, and experiences a drop-off in protein recovery at higher protein inputs. Magnetic beads may also contaminate samples and instruments, and become costly for larger scale protein preparations. Here, we propose solvent precipitation SP3 (SP4) as an alternative to SP3, omitting magnetic beads and employing brief centrifugation--either with or without low-cost inert glass beads--as the means of aggregated protein capture. SP4 recovered equivalent or greater protein yields for 1-5000 {micro}g preparations and improved reproducibility (median protein R2 0.99 (SP4) vs. 0.97 (SP3)). Deep proteome profiling (n = 9,076) also demonstrated improved recovery by SP4 and a significant enrichment of membrane and low-solubility proteins vs. SP3. The effectiveness of SP4 was verified in three other labs, each confirming equivalent or improved proteome characterisation over SP3. This work suggests that protein precipitation is the primary mechanism of SP3, and reliance on magnetic beads presents protein losses, especially at higher concentrations and amongst hydrophobic proteins. SP4 represents an efficient and effective alternative to SP3, provides the option to omit beads entirely, and offers virtually unlimited scalability of input and volume--all whilst retaining the speed and universality of SP3. BRIEFSolvent precipitation SP3 (SP4) captures aggregated protein for proteomics sample clean-up by omitting magnetic beads, instead employing brief centrifugation--with or without low-cost inert glass beads. SP4 offers improvements to protein yields, higher reproducibility, and greater recovery of membrane proteins, with verifications from three labs. Protein precipitation appears to be the primary mechanism of SP3, with reliance on magnetic beads presenting protein losses, especially at higher concentrations. SP4 presents an effective alternative to SP3 with improved scalability and equal speed and universality. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=135 SRC="FIGDIR/small/461247v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (49K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1ba615corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@14df25dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@62f0c1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1ac436a_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Differences in Protein Capture by SP3 and SP4 Demonstrate Mechanistic Insights of Proteomics Clean-up Techniques
Jessica M. Conforti, Amanda M. Ziegler, … Elyssia S. Gallagher·Journal of Proteome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Aug 20, 2024
- Protein Aggregation Capture for Top-down Proteomics
Isabella G Feltenstein, Bryon Drown·Journal of Proteome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Oct 26, 2026
- Protein aggregation capture on microparticles enables multi-purpose proteomics sample preparation
T. S. Batth, M. A. X. Tollenaere, … J. V. Olsen·bioRxiv·Oct 25, 2018
- Solid-Phase Extraction Capture (SPEC) in nanoliter volumes for fast, robust and ultra-sensitive proteomics
Tim Heymann, Denys Oliinyk, … Matthias Mann·bioRxiv·May 31, 2025
- Automated SP3 Workflow Enables Robust Sample Preparation on Proteonano Ultraplex Proteomics Platform
Yi Wang, Libing Wang, … Hao Wu·bioRxiv·May 27, 2025
- In search of the universal method: a comparative survey of bottom-up proteomics sample preparation methods
G. Varnavides, M. Madern, … M. Hartl·bioRxiv·May 4, 2022