Author

B. A. Smeester

Listed by name: these papers carry no ORCID for this author, so different people with the same name may be mixed together.

Biology Disciplines

Click to filter author papers

Bioengineering· 1 Biophysics· 1

Signature Assays, Organisms & Methods

Click to filter · or open tag

Research Focus:cell type annotation· 2 Approach:experimental assay· 2 Research Focus:cell-cell communication· 1 Assay:CRISPR screen· 1 Research Focus:differential expression· 1 Assay:DNA methylation· 1 Research Focus:gene regulatory network inference· 1 Approach:genetic perturbation / CRISPR· 1

Frequent Co-Authors

A. A. Andrew· 1 shared A. T. Smiley· 1 shared B. R. Webber· 1 shared B. S. Moriarity· 1 shared C.-L. Lonetree· 1 shared D. A. Largaespada· 1 shared D. J. Odde· 1 shared G. A. Shamsan· 1 shared

Activity by Year

2020-2022 · peak 1/yr

Co-Author Collaboration Network

10 top collaborators · 20 mutual co-author links

Click any collaborator node to inspect or filter shared papers

Focal author (center)Selected co-authorORCID co-authorUnlinked name

Curved chords = mutual co-authorship

1 shared paperBioengineering

A. A. Andrew

Mutual co-authors in cluster

Author profile →

2 papers

Recent·Most cited

RAD-TGTs: Measurement of cellular tensions via flow cytometry and DNA sequencing enabled by force-dependent rupture and delivery of DNA tension probes

M. R. Pawlak, A. T. Smiley, M. D. Kelly, G. A. Shamsan, S. M. Anderson, B. A. Smeester, D. A. Largaespada, D. J. Odde, W. R. Gordon

The paper introduces RAD-TGTs, a method to measure cellular tensions using DNA duplexes that rupture under force, with readout via flow cytometry and DNA sequencing.

bioRxiv · Nov 8, 2022 · PreprintBiophysics

CRISPR-Cas9 cytidine and adenosine base editing of splice-sites mediates highly-efficient disruption of proteins in primary cells

M. G. Kluesner, W. S. Lahr, C.-L. Lonetree, B. A. Smeester, P. N. Claudio-Vazquez, S. P. Pitzen, M. J. Vignes, S. C. Lee, S. P. Bingea, A. A. Andrew, B. R. Webber, B. S. Moriarity

The paper compares CBE and ABE base editors for splice-site disruption in T-cells, finding CBEs more reliable and splice-donor targeting most effective.

bioRxiv · Apr 16, 2020Bioengineering