Proteome-scale tissue mapping using mass spectrometry based on label-free and multiplexed workflows
Yu Mi KwoniD, Jongmin Jacob WooiD, Fengchao YuiD, Sarah WilliamsiD, Lye Meng MarkillieiD, Ronald Jay MooreiD, Ernesto Satoshi NakayasuiD, Jing CheniD, Martha Campbell‐ThompsoniD, Clayton E. MathewsiD, Alexey I. NesvizhskiiiD, Weijun QianiD, Ying ZhuiD
Abstract
Multiplexed bimolecular profiling of tissue microenvironment, or spatial omics, can provide deep insight into cellular compositions and interactions in healthy and diseased tissues. Proteome-scale tissue mapping, which aims to unbiasedly visualize all the proteins in a whole tissue section or region of interest, has attracted significant interest because it holds great potential to directly reveal diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets. While many approaches are available, however, proteome mapping still exhibits significant technical challenges in both protein coverage and analytical throughput. Since many of these existing challenges are associated with mass spectrometry-based protein identification and quantification, we performed a detailed benchmarking study of three protein quantification methods for spatial proteome mapping, including label-free, TMT-MS2, and TMT-MS3. Our study indicates label-free method provided the deepest coverages of [~]3500 proteins at a spatial resolution of 50 {micro}m and the highest quantification dynamic range, while TMT-MS2 method holds great benefit in mapping throughput at >125 pixels per day. The evaluation also indicates both label-free and TMT-MS2 provide robust protein quantifications in identifying differentially abundant proteins and spatially co-variable clusters. In the study of pancreatic islet microenvironment, we demonstrated deep proteome mapping not only enables the identification of protein markers specific to different cell types, but more importantly, it also reveals unknown or hidden protein patterns by spatial co-expression analysis.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 16
- FWCI
- 2.00
- Field percentile
- top 12%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A framework for ultra-low input spatial tissue proteomics
Anuar Makhmut, Di Qin, … Fabian Coscia·Cell SystemsPeer-reviewed·Oct 30, 2023
- Coupling microdroplet-based sample preparation, multiplexed isobaric labeling, and nanoflow peptide fractionation for deep proteome profiling of tissue microenvironment
M. Velickovic, T. L. Fillmore, … P. D. Piehowski·bioRxiv·Mar 13, 2023
- Deepening imaging-based spatial proteomics at high spatial resolution through controlled tissue resizing and in-situ bottom-up mass spectrometry
Kunyue Deng, Lingpeng Zhan, … Yanyi Huang·bioRxiv·Jun 12, 2025
- Robust collection and processing for label-free single voxel proteomics
Reta Birhanu Kitata, Marija Veličković, … Tujin Shi·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jan 13, 2025
- Hex-MASP for Mapping the Whole-tissue Spatial Proteome and the Intra-brain Distribution of Monoclonal Antibodies
Shihan Huo, Min Ma, … Jun Qu·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Sep 3, 2026
- Spatial single-cell mass spectrometry defines zonation of the hepatocyte proteome
Florian A. Rosenberger, Marvin Thielert, … Matthias Mann·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·Oct 1, 2023