Spatial analysis of NOS2 and COX2 interaction with T-effector cells reveals immunosuppressive landscapes associated with poor outcome in ER- breast cancer patients
L. A. Ridnourl, R. Y. Cheng, W. F. Heinz, M. Pore, A. L. Gonzalez, E. L. Femino, R. Moffat, A. L. Wink, F. Imtiaz, L. Coutinho, D. Butcher, E. F. Edmondson, C. Rangel, S. T. Wong, S. Lipkowitz, S. Glynn, D. W. McVicar, M. P. Vitek, X. Li, S. K. Anderson, N. Paolocci, S. M. Hewitt, S. Ambs, T. R. Billiar, J. C. Chang, , D. A. Wink
Abstract
Multiple immunosuppressive mechanisms exist in the tumor microenvironment that drive poor outcomes and decrease treatment efficacy. The co-expression of NOS2 and COX2 is a strong predictor of poor prognosis in ER- breast cancer and other malignancies. Together, they generate pro-oncogenic signals that drive metastasis, drug resistance, cancer stemness, and immune suppression. Using an ER- breast cancer patient cohort, we found that the spatial expression patterns of NOS2 and COX2 with CD3+CD8+PD1- T effector (Teff) cells formed a tumor immune landscape that correlated with poor outcome. NOS2 was primarily associated with the tumor-immune interface, whereas COX2 was associated with immune desert regions of the tumor lacking Teff cells. A higher ratio of NOS2 or COX2 to Teff was highly correlated with poor outcomes. Spatial analysis revealed that regional clustering of NOS2 and COX2 was associated with stromal-restricted Teff, while only COX2 was predominant in immune deserts. Examination of other immunosuppressive elements, such as PDL1/PD1, Treg, B7H4, and IDO1, revealed that PDL1/PD1, Treg, and IDO1 were primarily associated with restricted Teff, whereas B7H4 and COX2 were found in tumor immune deserts. Regardless of the survival outcome, other leukocytes, such as CD4 T cells and macrophages, were primarily in stromal lymphoid aggregates. Finally, in a 4T1 model, COX2 inhibition led to a massive cell infiltration, thus validating the hypothesis that COX2 is an essential component of the Teff exclusion process and, thus, tumor evasion. Our study indicates that NOS2/COX2 expression plays a central role in tumor immunosuppression. Our findings indicate that new strategies combining clinically available NOS2/COX2 inhibitors with various forms of immune therapy may open a new avenue for the treatment of aggressive ER- breast cancers.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- NOS2 and COX2 Provide Key Spatial Targets that Determine Outcome in ER- Breast Cancer
L. A. Ridnourl, W. F. Heinz, … D. A. Wink·bioRxiv·Dec 21, 2023
- Interferon-gamma is Quintessential for NOS and COX Expression in ER- Breast Tumors that Lead to Poor Outcome
R. Y. Cheng, L. A. Ridnourl, … D. A. Wink·bioRxiv·Apr 6, 2023
- NOS2 and COX2 Blockade Limits TNBC Disease Progression and Alters CD8+ T Cell Spatial Orientation and Density
V. Somasundaram, L. A. Ridnour, … D. A. Wink·bioRxiv·Jun 3, 2022
- ICOS blockade alleviates immune suppression in breast tumor microenvironment
Shalini Guleria, Chamikara Liyanage, … Bhupinder Pal·bioRxiv·Oct 23, 2026
- S-Nitrosylated COX-2 is a TME-regulated breast cancer biomarker of mesenchymal phenotypes
Reuben J. Hoffmann, AeSoon L. Bensen, … Pepper S. Schedin·bioRxiv·Jul 15, 2025
- S-nitrosylated and non-nitrosylated COX2 has differential expression and distinct subcellular localization in normal and breast cancer tissue
S. Jindal, N. D. Pennock, … P. J. Schedin·bioRxiv·May 20, 2020