Attractor Landscape Analysis Distinguishes Aging Markers from Rejuvenation Targets in Human Keratinocytes
Abstract
Cellular aging is characterized by progressive changes in gene expression that contribute to tissue dysfunction; however, identifying genes that regulate the aging process, rather than merely serve as biomarkers, remains a significant challenge. Here we present PRISM (Pseudotime Reversion via In Silico Modeling), a computational pipeline that integrates pseudotime trajectory analysis with Boolean network analysis to identify cellular rejuvenation targets from single-cell RNA sequencing data. We applied PRISM to a published dataset of human skin comprising 47,060 cells from nine donors aged 18 to 76 years. Analysis of keratinocytes revealed two distinct aging trajectories with fundamentally different regulatory architectures. One trajectory (labeled Y_272) exhibited "aging as convergence," where cells were driven toward a single dominant aged attractor (aging score +2.181). A second trajectory (labeled Y_308) exhibited "aging as departure," where cells escaped from a dominant youthful attractor basin (aging score -0.536). Systematic perturbation analysis revealed a critical distinction between genes exhibiting age-related expression changes (phenotypic markers) and genes controlling attractor landscape architecture (regulatory controllers). Switch genes marking the aging trajectories proved largely ineffective as intervention targets, while master regulators operating at higher levels of the regulatory hierarchy produced substantial rejuvenation effects. BACH2 knockdown was identified as the dominant intervention for Y_272, shifting the aging score by {Delta}= -3.746 (98.9% improvement). ASCL2 knockdown was identified as the top target for Y_308, with synergistic enhancement observed through combinatorial perturbation with ATF6. These findings demonstrate that attractor-based analysis identifies different and potentially superior therapeutic targets compared to expression-based approaches and provide specific hypotheses for experimental validation of cellular rejuvenation strategies in human skin.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A single factor for safer cellular rejuvenation
Lucas Paulo de Lima Camillo, Rihab Gam, … Brendan Swain·bioRxiv·Jun 5, 2025
- Systematic Approach Identifies Multiple Transcription Factor Perturbations That Rejuvenate Replicatively Aged Human Skin Fibroblasts
J. Sengstack, J. Zheng, … H. Li·bioRxiv·Nov 20, 2022
- Transcriptomic reprogramming screen identifies SRSF1 as rejuvenation factor
Alexandru M. Pleşa, Sascha Jung, … George McDonald Church·bioRxiv·Nov 13, 2023
- Human skin rejuvenation via mRNA
Li Li, Zhengkuan Tang, … George McDonald Church·Journal of Investigative DermatologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 21, 2026
- Convergence of aging- and rejuvenation-related epigenetic alterations on PRC2 targets
Michael A. Koldobskiy, Oscar M. Camacho, … Andrew P. Feinberg·bioRxiv·Jun 8, 2023
- Multi-omic rejuvenation of human cells by maturation phase transient reprogramming
Diljeet Gill, Aled Parry, … Wolf Reik·eLifePeer-reviewed·Apr 7, 2022