Macrophage proliferation machinery leads to PDAC progression, but susceptibility to innate immunotherapy.
D. G. DeNardo, C. Zuo, J. M. Baer, B. L. Knolhoff, J. I. Belle, X. Liu, G. D. Hogg, C. Fu, N. L. Kingston, M. A. Brenden, A. Alarcon De La Lastra, P. B. Dodhiawala, C. Zhou, A. James, L. Ding, L. Kian-Huat, R. C. Fields, W. G. Hawkins, G. Zhao, J. D. Weber
Abstract
Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are involved in many aspects of cancer progression and correlate with poor clinical outcomes in many cancer types, including pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs). Previous studies have shown that TAMs can populate PDAC tumors not only by monocyte recruitment but also by local proliferation. However, the impact local proliferation might have on macrophage phenotype and cancer progression is unknown. Here, we utilized genetically engineered cancer models, single-cell RNA-sequencing data, and in vitro systems to show that proliferation of TAMs was driven by colony stimulating factor-1 (CSF1) produced by cancer-associated fibroblasts. CSF1 induced high levels of p21 in macrophages, which regulated both TAM proliferation and phenotype. TAMs in human and mouse PDACs with high levels of p21 had more inflammatory and immunosuppressive phenotypes. The p21 expression in TAMs was induced by both stromal interaction and/or chemotherapy treatment. Finally, by modeling p21 expression levels in TAMs, we found that p21-driven macrophage immunosuppression in vivo drove tumor progression. Serendipitously, the same p21-driven pathways that drive tumor progression, also drive response to CD40 agonist. These data suggest that stromal or therapy-induced regulation of cell cycle machinery can regulate both macrophage-mediated immune suppression and susceptibility to innate immunotherapy. SummaryTAMs are indicative of poor clinical outcomes and in PDAC their number is sustained in part by local proliferation. This study shows that stromal desmoplasia drives local proliferation of TAMs, and induces their immunosuppressive ability through altering cell cycle machinery, including p21 expression. Serendipitously, these changes in p21 in TAMs also potentially render tumors more sensitive to CD40 agonist therapy.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Tumor-associated tissue-resident macrophages drive pancreatic cancer progression through IGF1-IGF1R signaling
Yuya Yamamoto, Kenta Takeuchi, … Hideki Taniguchi·bioRxiv·May 12, 2026
- Notch signaling regulates immunosuppressive tumor-associated macrophage function in pancreatic cancer
W. Yan, N. G. Steele, … F. Bednar·bioRxiv·Jan 11, 2023
- Tumor-specific CD4 T cells instruct monocyte differentiation in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
M. T. Patterson, A. L. Burrack, … I. M. Stromnes·bioRxiv·Nov 9, 2022
- A macrophage-derived noncanonical WNT niche drives immune exclusion in pancreatic cancer
Na Hyun Kim, Young Min Song, … Yi Rang Na·bioRxiv·Feb 9, 2026
- An immunomechanical checkpoint PYK2 governs monocyte-to-macrophage differentiation in pancreatic cancer
Wenyan Xie, Xin Yu, … Hong Jiang·Cancer DiscoveryPeer-reviewed·May 8, 2025
- Targeting Siglec-10/α3β1 Integrin Interactions Enhances Macrophage-Mediated Phagocytosis of Pancreatic Cancer
Pratima Saini, Gauri Mirji, … Mohamed Abdel‐Mohsen·Cancer ResearchPeer-reviewed·Nov 3, 2025