Clonal assessment of functional mutations in cancer based on a genotype-aware method for clonal reconstruction
Paul Deveau, Leo Colmet Daage, Derek Oldridge, Virginie Bernard, Angela BelliniiD, Mathieu ChicardiD, Nathalie Clement, Eve Lapouble, Valérie Combaret, Anne BolandiD, Vincent MeyeriD, Jean-François Deleuze, Isabelle Janoueix-Lerosey, Emmanuel Barillot, Olivier DelattreiD, John Maris, Gudrun SchleiermacheriD, Valentina Boeva
Abstract
In cancer, clonal evolution is characterized based on single nucleotide variants and copy number alterations. Nonetheless, previous methods failed to combine information from both sources to accurately reconstruct clonal populations in a given tumor sample or in a set of tumor samples coming from the same patient. Moreover, previous methods accepted as input all variants predicted by variant-callers, regardless of differences in dispersion of variant allele frequencies (VAFs) due to uneven depth of coverage and possible presence of strand bias, prohibiting accurate inference of clonal architecture. We present a general framework for assignment of functional mutations to specific cancer clones, which is based on distinction between passenger variants with expected low dispersion of VAF versus putative functional variants, which may not be used for the reconstruction of cancer clonal architecture but can be assigned to inferred clones at the final stage. The key element of our framework is QuantumClone, a method to cluster variants into clones, which we have thoroughly tested on simulated data. QuantumClone takes into account VAFs and genotypes of corresponding regions together with information about normal cell contamination. We applied our framework to whole genome sequencing data for 19 neuroblastoma trios each including constitutional, diagnosis and relapse samples. We discovered specific pathways recurrently altered by deleterious mutations in different clonal populations. Some such pathways were previously reported (e.g., MAPK and neuritogenesis) while some were novel (e.g., epithelial-mesenchymal transition, cell survival and DNA repair). Most pathways and their modules had more mutations at relapse compared to diagnosis.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- MuClone: Somatic mutation detection and classification through probabilistic integration of clonal population structure
Fatemeh Dorri, Sean Jewell, … Sohrab P. Shah·bioRxiv·Sep 20, 2017
- Tracing the evolution of aneuploid cancers from multiregional sequencing
Subhayan Chattopadhyay, Jenny Karlsson, … David Gisselsson·Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jul 10, 2021
- SVclone: inferring structural variant cancer cell fraction
M. Cmero, C. S. Ong, … G. Macintyre·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Feb 5, 2020
- Tumor subclones, where are you?
- Decomposing the subclonal structure of tumors with two-way mixture models on copy number aberrations
An‐Shun Tai, Chien-Hua Peng, … Wen‐Ping Hsieh·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Dec 12, 2018
- SiCloneFit: Bayesian inference of population structure, genotype, and phylogeny of tumor clones from single-cell genome sequencing data
Hamim Zafar, Nicholas E. Navin, … Luay K. Nakhleh·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2019