Genome biologyGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article
In situ genome editing method suitable for routine generation of germline modified animal models
Masato OhtsukaiD, Masahiro SatoiD, Hiromi MiuraiD, Shuji TakabayashiiD, Makoto MatsuyamaiD, Takayuki KoyanoiD, Naomi Arifin, Shingo NakamuraiD, Kenta WadaiD, Channabasavaiah B. GurumurthyiD
Abstract
Animal genome engineering experimental procedures involve three major steps: isolation of zygotes from pregnant females; microinjection of zygotes, and; transfer of injected zygotes into recipient females, that have been practiced for over three decades. The laboratory set ups intending to performing these procedures require to have sophisticated equipment as well as highly skilled technical personnel. Because of these reasons, animal transgenesis experiments are typically performed at centralized core facilities in most research organizations. We recently showed that all three steps, of animal transgensis, can be bypassed using a method termed GONAD (Genome-editing via Oviductal Nucleic Acids Delivery), by directly electroporating genome editing components into zygotes in situ. Although our first report demonstrated the genome-editing capability, its efficiency was lower than the standard methods using microinjection. Here we investigated critical parameters of GONAD to make it suitable for creating animal models of large genomic deletions, single nucleotide corrections and long sequence insertions. The efficiency of genome editing in the improved GONAD (i-GONAD) method reached to the levels comparable to traditional microinjection methods. The streamlined parameters, and the simplified experimental steps, in the i-GONAD method makes it suitable for routine genome editing applications performed both at centralized facilities as well as at the laboratories that lack highly skilled personnel and the sophisticated equipment.
- organism: mouse
- research focus: genome assembly
- research focus: variant calling
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 217
- FWCI
- 5.96
- Field percentile
- top 2%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Mouse Genome Editing from Scratch
J. Popova, V. Bets, … E. Kozhevnikova·bioRxiv·Nov 20, 2023
- An optimized electroporation approach for efficient CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in murine zygotes
Simon E. Tröder, Lena K. Ebert, … Branko Zevnik·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·May 3, 2018
- Early zygotic engineering promotes targeted large transgene integration and direct production of fully transgenic animals
Khusali Gupta, Ping Xu, … Jeanne Bentley Lawrence·bioRxiv·Sep 29, 2024
- Robust generation of transgenic mice by hypotonic shock mediated transgene delivery in testicular germ cells
Abul Usmani, Nirmalya Ganguli, … Subeer S Majumdar·bioRxiv·Jun 16, 2016
- Base pair editing of goat embryos: nonsense codon introgression into FGF5 to improve cashmere yield
Guanwei Li, Shiwei Zhou, … Xiaolong Wang·bioRxiv·Jun 15, 2018
- Prime editing in chicken fibroblasts and primordial germ cells
Yuji Atsuta, Katsuya Suzuki, … Daisuke Saito·Development Growth & DifferentiationPeer-reviewed·Nov 14, 2022