Retroelement co-option disrupts the cancer transcriptional programme
Jane Ho Chun LoongiD, R. Houston ThompsoniD, Callum HalliD, Laura E. Doglio, Judith PapeiD, Tobias PlowmaniD, George KassiotisiD
Abstract
BackgroundTranscriptional activation of otherwise repressed endogenous retroelements (RTEs) is a hallmark of cancer, shaping tumour progression and immunogenicity by multifaceted, yet incompletely understood mechanisms. MethodsWe used an extended pan-cancer transcriptome assembly to identify potential effects of RTEs on the genes near or within which they have integrated. These were subsequently verified in test cases by further analysis of transcriptional profiles in cancer patient data, and by in vitro studies involving restoration of gene activity, and proliferation and migration assays in cancer cell lines. ResultsWe report that cancer-specific transcriptional activation of RTEs causes frequent reduction or loss of gene function. Exonisation and alternative splicing of RTEs creates non-functional RNA and protein isoforms and derepressed RTE promoter activity initiates antisense transcription, both at the expense of the canonical isoforms. Contrary to theoretical expectation, transcriptionally activated RTEs affect genes with established tumour-promoting function, including the common essential RNGTT and the lung cancer-promoting CHRNA5 genes. Furthermore, the disruptive effect of RTE activation on adjacent tumour-promoting genes is associated with slower disease progression in clinical data, whereas experimental restoration of gene activity enhances tumour cell in vitro growth and invasiveness ConclusionsThese findings underscore the gene-disruptive potential of seemingly innocuous germline RTE integrations, unleashed only by their transcriptional utilisation in cancer. They further suggest that such metastable RTE integrations are co-opted as sensors of the epigenetic and transcriptional changes occurring during cellular transformation and as executors that disrupt the function of tumour-promoting genes.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 8
- FWCI
- 4.30
- Field percentile
- top 6%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Transposable elements as tissue-specific enhancers in cancers of endodermal lineage
Konsta Karttunen, Divyesh Patel, … Biswajyoti Sahu·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2023
- Transposable elements mediate genetic effects altering the expression of nearby genes in colorectal cancer
Nikolaos M R Lykoskoufis, Evarist Planet, … Emmanouil T Dermitzakis·La PerinolaPeer-reviewed·Jan 25, 2024
- Enhancer activation from transposable elements in extrachromosomal DNA
Katerina Kraft, Sedona E. Murphy, … Howard Y. Chang·Nature Cell BiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 21, 2025
- Transcriptomic splicing analysis reveals a gene-independent form of TE reactivation in tumors representing unrecognized source of oncogenes and neoantigens
Ziteng Li, Yichao Bao, … Shenglin Huang·bioRxiv·Mar 1, 2025
- TEDEdb: a large-scale resource and multi-cohort analysis of transposable element differential expression in cancer
Gennaro Calendo, Morgan Chaunzwa, … Jean‐Pierre J. Issa·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Oct 28, 2026
- TAD hierarchy restricts poised LTR activation and loss of TAD hierarchy promotes LTR co-option in cancer
Elissa W.P. Wong, Merve Şahin, … Ping Chi·Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 30, 2025