henhaobio
Sign in

EMBO ReportsMolecular BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article

Two redundant ubiquitin-dependent pathways of BRCA1 localization to DNA damage sites

Alana SherkeriD, Natasha ChaudharyiD, Salomé Adam, Anne Margriet HeijinkiD, Sylvie M. NoordermeeriD, Amélie Fradet‐TurcotteiD, Daniel DurocheriD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

The tumor suppressor BRCA1 accumulates at sites of DNA damage in a ubiquitin-dependent manner. In this work, we revisit the role of the ubiquitin-binding protein RAP80 in BRCA1 recruitment to damaged chromatin. We found that RAP80, or the phosphopeptide-binding residues in the BRCA1 BRCT domains, act redundantly with the BRCA1 RING domain to promote BRCA1 recruitment to DNA double-strand break sites. We show that that RNF8 E3 ubiquitin ligase acts upstream of both the RAP80- and RING-dependent activities whereas RNF168 acts uniquely upstream of the RING domain. The function of the RING domain in BRCA1 recruitment is not solely linked to its role in mediating an interaction with BARD1 since RING mutations that do not impact BARD1 interaction, such as the E2-binding deficient Ile26Ala (I26A) mutation, produce a BRCA1 protein unable to accumulate at DNA damage sites in the absence of RAP80. Cells that combine the BRCA1 I26A mutation and mutations that disable the RAP80-BRCA1 interaction are deficient in RAD51 filament formation and are hypersensitive to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibition. Our results suggest that in the absence of RAP80, the BRCA1 E3 ligase activity is necessary for the recognition of unmethylated histone H4 Lys20 and histone H2A Lys13/Lys15 ubiquitylation by BARD1 although we cannot rule out the possibility that the RING- E2 complex itself may facilitate ubiquitylated nucleosome recognition in other ways. Finally, given that tumors expressing RING-less BRCA1 isoforms readily acquire resistance to therapy, this work suggests that targeting RAP80, or its interaction with BRCA1, could represent a novel strategy for restoring sensitivity of such tumors to DNA damaging agents.

Citations
29
FWCI
1.10
Field percentile
top 24%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.