bioRxivMolecular BiologyPreprint
Combining Cas9 and dCas9 facilitates genome editing in genes associated with viability or welfare issues, or within paralogous gene clusters
Skevoulla ChristouiD, Connor MacfarlaneiD, Adam CaulderiD, Gemma F. CodneriD, Sarah N. DowdingiD, Matthew MackenzieiD, Jade DesjardinsiD, Karen J. LiuiD, Anthony R IslesiD, Michelle E. StewartiD, Sara WellsiD, Lydia TebouliD
Abstract
The high efficiency of genome editing presents a challenge when modifying genes associated with viability, welfare, or fertility issues, as implementation of the technology frequently results in mosaic animals with bi-allelic mutations. Combining deactivated Cas9 (dCas9) with Cas9 has been proposed as a strategy to protect one of the two target alleles from editing. We piloted this strategy with 11 genes that are reported as homozygous lethal or associated with welfare issues. We showed that the viability of founders was significantly increased when using 80:20 or 90:10 dCas9:Cas9 ratios, whereas the 70:30 ratio did not yield an equivalent protective effect. The associated overall production rate of mutated founder per manipulated embryo was significantly higher for the 80:20 ratio. Concomitantly, an increased proportion of dCas9 was associated with a significant increase in retention of unedited target alleles but, importantly, did not hinder germline transmission. In addition, editing genes in a paralog cluster with a combination of dCas9 and Cas9 reduced unwanted off-target editing, illustrating a further potential applicability of this approach. This study defines the optimal ratio between dCas9 and Cas9 for strategies aimed at achieving mono-allelic mutations within mosaic founders and proposes a means to reduce the incidence of off-target effects in experiments with limited gRNA options.
- organism: mouse
- assay: CRISPR screen
- research focus: variant calling
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- dCas allele sequestration (das-CRISPR): A Versatile New Method to Achieve Monoallelic Gene Editing in Mouse Embryos and in cell culture.
Ghassan Yehia, Jian Pan, … Peter J. Romanienko·bioRxiv·Jun 4, 2026
- Evaluation of Mosaicism and Off Target Mutations in CRISPR-Mediated Genome Edited Bovine Embryos
S. L. Henning, J. R. Owen, … J. D. Murray·bioRxiv·Jun 4, 2020
- CRISPR-Cas9-induced genetic mosaicism in three species of the microcrustacean Daphnia
Sen Xu, Swatantra Neupane, L. Wang·GenomePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026
- Strategies For Efficient Genome Editing Using CRISPR-Cas9
Behnom Farboud, Aaron F. Severson, Barbara J Meyer·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Nov 30, 2018
- Allele-specific genome editing using CRISPR-Cas9 causes off-target mutations in diploid yeast
Arthur R. Gorter de Vries, Lucas G. F. Couwenberg, … Jean-Marc G Daran·bioRxiv·Aug 22, 2018
- Phage DNA polymerase prevents deleterious on-target damage and enhances precise CRISPR/Cas9 editing
Q. Yang, J. S. Abebe, … C. Long·bioRxiv·Jan 10, 2023