bioRxivMicrobiology
SARS-coronavirus-2 replication in Vero E6 cells: replication kinetics, rapid adaptation and cytopathology
N. Ogando, T. Dalebout, J. C. Zevenhoven-Dobbe, R. W. A. L. Limpens, Y. van der Meer, L. Caly, J. Druce, J. de Vries, M. Kikkert, M. Barcena, I. Sidorov, E. J. Snijder
Abstract
The sudden emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) at the end of 2019 from the Chinese province of Hubei and its subsequent pandemic spread highlight the importance of understanding the full molecular details of coronavirus infection and pathogenesis. Here, we compared a variety of replication features of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV and analysed the cytopathology caused by the two closely related viruses in the commonly used Vero E6 cell line. Compared to SARS-CoV, SARS-CoV-2 generated higher levels of intracellular viral RNA, but strikingly about 50-fold less infectious viral progeny was recovered from the culture medium. Immunofluorescence microscopy of SARS-CoV-2-infected cells established extensive cross-reactivity of antisera previously raised against a variety of nonstructural proteins, membrane and nucleocapsid protein of SARS-CoV. Electron microscopy revealed that the ultrastructural changes induced by the two SARS viruses are very similar and occur within comparable time frames after infection. Furthermore, we determined that the sensitivity of the two viruses to three established inhibitors of coronavirus replication (Remdesivir, Alisporivir and chloroquine) is very similar, but that SARS-CoV-2 infection was substantially more sensitive to pre-treatment of cells with pegylated interferon alpha. An important difference between the two viruses is the fact that - upon passaging in Vero E6 cells - SARS-CoV-2 apparently is under strong selection pressure to acquire adaptive mutations in its spike protein gene. These mutations change or delete a putative furin-like cleavage site in the region connecting the S1 and S2 domains and result in a very prominent phenotypic change in plaque assays.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Rapid SARS-CoV-2 Adaptation to Available Cellular Proteases
M. Z. Chaudhry, K. Eschke, … L. Cicin-Sain·bioRxiv·Aug 10, 2020
- SARS-CoV-2 Variants Reveal Features Critical for Replication in Primary Human Cells
M. O. Pohl, I. Busnadiego, … B. G. Hale·bioRxiv·Oct 22, 2020
- In vitro comparison of SARS-CoV-2 variants
K. S. Phadke, N. B. A. Higdon, B. H. Bellaire·bioRxiv·Mar 11, 2023
- SARS-CoV-2 susceptibility of cell lines and substrates commonly used in diagnosis and isolation of influenza and other viruses
- SARS-CoV-2 diverges from other betacoronaviruses in only partially activating the IRE1α/XBP1 ER stress pathway in human lung-derived cells
L. C. Nguyen, D. M. Renner, … S. R. Weiss·bioRxiv·Dec 30, 2021
- Type I interferon susceptibility distinguishes SARS-CoV-2 from SARS-CoV.
K. G. Lokugamage, A. Hage, … V. D. Menachery·Journal of VirologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 9, 2020