Genome biologyBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Multiple-gene targeting and mismatch tolerance can confound analysis of genome-wide pooled CRISPR screens
Jean‐Philippe FortiniD, Jenille TaniD, Karen E. GascoigneiD, Peter M. Haverty, William F. ForrestiD, Michael Rodrigues CostaiD, Scott E. MartiniD
Abstract
Genome-wide loss-of-function screens using the CRISPR/Cas9 system allow the efficient discovery of cancer cell vulnerabilities. While several studies have focused on correcting for DNA cleavage toxicity biases associated with copy number alterations, the effects of sgRNAs co-targeting multiple genomic loci in CRISPR screens have not been discussed yet. In this work, we analyze CRISPR essentiality screen data from 391 cancer cell lines to characterize biases induced by multi-target sgRNAs. We investigate two types of multi-targets: on-targets predicted through perfect sequence complementarity, and off-targets predicted through sequence complementarity with up to two nucleotide mismatches. We found that the number of on-targets and off-targets both increase sgRNA activity in a cell line-specific manner, and that existing additive models of gene knockout effects fail at capturing genetic interactions that may occur between co-targeted genes. We use synthetic lethality between paralog genes to show that genetic interactions can introduce biases in essentiality scores estimated from multi-target sgRNAs. We further show that single-mismatch tolerant sgRNAs can confound the analysis of gene essentiality and lead to incorrect co-essentiality functional networks.
- organism: human
- assay: CRISPR screen
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 43
- FWCI
- 2.48
- Field percentile
- top 10%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Biases and Blind-Spots in Genome-Wide CRISPR Knockout Screens
Merve Dede, Eiru Kim, Traver Hart·bioRxiv·Jan 16, 2020
- A survey of multi-targeting and off-targeting sgRNAs across five genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 knockout sgRNA libraries with GuideRefine
Stefanus Bernard, Michael D. Rainey, … Colm J. Ryan·bioRxiv·Aug 20, 2026
- Computational correction of off-targeting for CRISPR-Cas9 essentiality screens
Alexendar R. Perez, Laura Sala, … Joana Alves Vidigal·bioRxiv·Jul 3, 2020
- Computational correction of copy-number effect improves specificity of CRISPR-Cas9 essentiality screens in cancer cells
Robin M. Meyers, Jordan Bryan, … Aviad Tsherniak·Nature GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Oct 30, 2017
- Integrated cross-study datasets of genetic dependencies in cancer
Clare Pacini, Joshua M. Dempster, … Francesco Iorio·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Mar 12, 2021
- Pooled CRISPR screening at high sensitivity with an empirically designed sgRNA library
Luisa Henkel, Benedikt Rauscher, … Michael Boutros·BMC BiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 23, 2020