bioRxivCancer BiologyPreprint
A multi-center study on factors influencing the reproducibility of in vitro drug-response studies
M. Niepel, M. Hafner, C. Mills, K. Subramanian, E. H. Williams, M. Chung, B. Gaudio, A. M. Barrette, A. D. Stern, B. Hu, J. E. Korkola, LINCS Consortium, J. W. Gray, M. R. Birtwistle, L. M. Heiser, P. K. Sorger
Abstract
Evidence that some influential biomedical results cannot be repeated has increased interest in practices that generate data meeting findable, accessible, interoperable and reproducible (FAIR) standards. Multiple papers have identified examples of irreproducibility, but practical steps for increasing reproducibility have not been widely studied. Here, seven research centers in the NIH LINCS Program Consortium investigate the reproducibility of a prototypical perturbational assay: quantifying the responsiveness of cultured cells to anti-cancer drugs. Such assays are important for drug development, studying cell biology, and patient stratification. While many experimental and computational factors have an impact on intra- and inter-center reproducibility, the factors most difficult to identify and correct are those with a strong dependency on biological context. These factors often vary in magnitude with the drug being analyzed and with growth conditions. We provide ways of identifying such context-sensitive factors, thereby advancing the conceptual and practical basis for greater experimental reproducibility.
- assay: proteomics
- assay: metabolomics
- research focus: drug response / drug discovery
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: batch correction / integration
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Data variability in standardised cell culture experiments
I. Reddin, T. R. Fenton, … M. Michaelis·bioRxiv·Feb 27, 2021
- A Reaction Norm Perspective on Reproducibility
Bernhard Voelkl, Hanno Würbel·Theory in BiosciencesPeer-reviewed·Mar 25, 2021
- Improving reproducibility in pharmacogenomic screens through cross-study benchmarking
Kristen Michelle Nader, Filipp Ianevski, … Tero A. Aittokallio·bioRxiv·May 3, 2026
- Reproducibility2020: Progress and Priorities
L. Freedman, G. Venugopalan, R. Wisman·bioRxiv·Feb 16, 2017
- Biomedical researchers perspectives on the reproducibility of research: a cross-sectional international survey
K. D. Cobey, S. Ebrahimzadeh, … D. Moher·bioRxiv·Sep 18, 2023
- Evidence provided by high-impact cell culture studies does not support authors' claims
A. B. Ozkaya, C. Geyik·bioRxiv·Apr 12, 2021