bioRxivNeurosciencePreprint
Brain-wide single neuron reconstruction reveals morphological diversity in molecularly defined striatal, thalamic, cortical and claustral neuron types
Hanchuan PengiD, Peng XieiD, Lijuan LiuiD, Xiuli KuangiD, Yimin WangiD, Lei QuiD, Hui GongiD, Shengdian JiangiD, Anan LiiD, Zongcai RuaniD, Liya DingiD, Chao CheniD, Mengya Chen, Tanya L. DaigleiD, Zhangcan Ding, Yanjun DuaniD, Aaron Feiner, Ping He, Chris HilliD, Karla E. HirokawaiD, Guodong Hong, Lei HuangiD, Sara KebedeiD, Hsien-Chi KuoiD, Rachael LarseniD, , Hongkui ZengiD
Abstract
Ever since the seminal findings of Ramon y Cajal, dendritic and axonal morphology has been recognized as a defining feature of neuronal types. Yet our knowledge concerning the diversity of neuronal morphologies, in particular distal axonal projection patterns, is extremely limited. To systematically obtain single neuron full morphology on a brain-wide scale, we established a platform with five major components: sparse labeling, whole-brain imaging, reconstruction, registration, and classification. We achieved sparse, robust and consistent fluorescent labeling of a wide range of neuronal types by combining transgenic or viral Cre delivery with novel transgenic reporter lines. We acquired high-resolution whole-brain fluorescent images from a large set of sparsely labeled brains using fluorescence micro-optical sectioning tomography (fMOST). We developed a set of software tools for efficient large-volume image data processing, registration to the Allen Mouse Brain Common Coordinate Framework (CCF), and computer-assisted morphological reconstruction. We reconstructed and analyzed the complete morphologies of 1,708 neurons from the striatum, thalamus, cortex and claustrum. Finally, we classified these cells into multiple morphological and projection types and identified a set of region-specific organizational rules of long-range axonal projections at the single cell level. Specifically, different neuron types from different regions follow highly distinct rules in convergent or divergent projection, feedforward or feedback axon termination patterns, and between-cell homogeneity or heterogeneity. Major molecularly defined classes or types of neurons have correspondingly distinct morphological and projection patterns, however, we also identify further remarkably extensive morphological and projection diversity at more fine-grained levels within the major types that cannot presently be accounted for by preexisting transcriptomic subtypes. These insights reinforce the importance of full morphological characterization of brain cell types and suggest a plethora of ways different cell types and individual neurons may contribute to the function of their respective circuits.
- organism: mouse
- assay: spatial transcriptomics
- research focus: cell type annotation
- approach: statistical model
- approach: experimental assay
Abstract summary
Claude Opus 5.5 · xhigh effort · 18 Oct 2026 · from the abstract
Complete morphologies of 1,708 neurons, sparsely labelled and imaged whole-brain with fMOST, expose region-specific long-range projection rules and finer diversity than current transcriptomic subtypes capture.
Dendritic and axonal shape has defined neuron types since Cajal, yet knowledge of how distal axons project across the brain is extremely limited. A pipeline joining sparse labelling, whole-brain imaging, reconstruction, registration and classification delivers full single-cell morphologies at a scale where projection rules can be compared between regions.
Key results
ShownFull morphologies were reconstructed for 1,708 neurons from striatum, thalamus, cortex and claustrum and sorted into several morphological and projection types.
1,708 neurons reconstructed from fMOST whole-brain images registered to the Allen Mouse Brain Common Coordinate Framework; the abstract gives no per-region counts and no number of types. · Abstract
SuggestedLong-range axonal organization follows rules that differ by region and type, along axes of convergent versus divergent projection, feedforward versus feedback termination, and how alike cells of one type are.
Described qualitatively in the abstract for the four regions; no statistics, rule counts or per-type measurements accompany the description. · Abstract
ClaimedMajor molecularly defined classes map onto distinct morphologies, but finer morphological and projection variation inside those classes is not explained by the transcriptomic subtypes available.
Asserted in the abstract without naming the transcriptomic taxonomy compared against or quantifying how much variation stays unexplained. · Abstract
Methods, data and reproducibility
A five-part platform: sparse fluorescent labelling combining transgenic or viral Cre delivery with new reporter lines, whole-brain imaging by fluorescence micro-optical sectioning tomography (fMOST), software for large-volume image processing and computer-assisted reconstruction, registration to the Allen Mouse Brain Common Coordinate Framework, and classification of the reconstructed cells.
- Sparsely labelled brains imaged whole by fMOST and reconstructed into complete single-neuron morphologies · mouse (registered to the Allen Mouse Brain CCF) · n = 1,708 neurons from striatum, thalamus, cortex and claustrum
- Methods & tools
- fMOST, Allen Mouse Brain Common Coordinate Framework (CCF), Cre delivery (transgenic or viral) with transgenic fluorescent reporter lines
- Reproducibility gaps
- Image-processing, registration and reconstruction software is said to be developed here, but no repository, morphology archive or image data location is named in the abstract.
Limitations (2)
- The projection rules and the cell classification are presented without statistics, per-region neuron counts or a stated number of types, so their robustness cannot be judged from the abstract. · noted in this summary
- The mismatch with transcriptomic subtypes is asserted without naming a specific taxonomy or reporting a comparison, and no cells here were profiled transcriptomically according to the abstract. · noted in this summary
Read this if you build neuron type taxonomies and need brain-wide single-cell axonal morphology to test how far transcriptomic subtypes track projection patterns.
- Citations
- 43
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Discovery of neuronal cell types by pairing whole cell reconstructions with RNA expression profiles
Tiago Ferreira, Mark Eddison, … MouseLight Project Team·bioRxiv·Dec 30, 2024
- Reconstruction of 1,000 projection neurons reveals new cell types and organization of long-range connectivity in the mouse brain
Johan Winnubst, Erhan Bas, … Jayaram V. Chandrashekar·CellPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2019
- Integrated Classification of Cortical Cells and Quantitative Projectomic Mapping Unveil Organizational Principles of Brain-Wide Connectomes at Single Cell Level
Yun Wang, Hsien-Chi Kuo, … Staci A. Sorensen·bioRxiv·May 8, 2025
- Neuronal Connectivity as a Determinant of Cell Types and Subtypes
Lijuan Liu, Zhixi Yun, … Hanchuan Peng·bioRxiv·Aug 9, 2023
- Classification of electrophysiological and morphological types in mouse visual cortex
Nathan W. Gouwens, Staci A. Sorensen, … Christof Koch A·Nature NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jun 17, 2019
- Neuronal morphology and projection analysis by multispectral tracing in densely labeled mouse brain
Douglas H. Roossien, Benjamin V. Sadis, … Dawen Cai·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 2, 2019