BMC Medical GenomicsGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article
Enhancer variants associated with Alzheimer’s disease affect gene expression via chromatin looping
Masataka KikuchiiD, Norikazu HaraiD, Mai Hasegawa, Akinori MiyashitaiD, Ryozo KuwanoiD, Takeshi IkeuchiiD, Akihiro NakayaiD
Abstract
BackgroundGenome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that may be genetic factors underlying Alzheimers disease (AD). However, how these AD-associated SNPs (AD SNPs) contribute to the pathogenesis of this disease is poorly understood because most of them are located in non-coding regions, such as introns and intergenic regions. Previous studies reported that some disease-associated SNPs affect regulatory elements including enhancers. We hypothesized that non-coding AD SNPs are located in enhancers and affect gene expression levels via chromatin loops.\n\nResultsWe examined enhancer locations that were predicted in 127 human tissues or cell types, including ten brain tissues, and identified chromatin-chromatin interactions by Hi-C experiments. We report the following findings: (1) nearly 30% of non-coding AD SNPs are located in enhancers; (2) expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) genes affected by non-coding AD SNPs within enhancers are associated with amyloid beta clearance, synaptic transmission, and immune responses; (3) 95% of the AD SNPs located in enhancers co-localize with their eQTL genes in topologically associating domains suggesting that regulation may occur through chromatin higher-order structures; (4) rs1476679 spatially contacts the promoters of eQTL genes via CTCF-CTCF interactions; (5) the effect of other AD SNPs such as rs7364180 is likely to be, at least in part, indirect through regulation of transcription factors that in turn regulate AD associated genes.\n\nConclusionOur results suggest that non-coding AD SNPs may affect the function of enhancers thereby influencing the expression levels of surrounding or distant genes via chromatin loops. This result may explain how some non-coding AD SNPs contribute to AD pathogenesis.
- organism: human
- assay: whole-genome sequencing
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 74
- FWCI
- 7.20
- Field percentile
- top 2%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Integration of Alzheimer's GWAS, 3D genomics, and single-cell CRISPRi non-coding screen implicates causal variants in a microglial enhancer regulating TSPAN14.
Shannon Laub, Natalia M. Tulina, … Alessandra Chesi·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·May 26, 2026
- Inferring the molecular mechanisms of noncoding Alzheimer’s disease-associated genetic variants
Alexandre Amlie‐Wolf, Mitchell Tang, … Gerard D. Schellenberg·Journal of Alzheimer s DiseasePeer-reviewed·Sep 24, 2019
- Integration of Alzheimer’s disease genetics and myeloid genomics reveals novel disease risk mechanisms
Gloriia Novikova, Edoardo M. Marcora, … Alison Goate·Alzheimer s & DementiaPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2020
- Targeted Sequencing of Alzheimers Disease Genes in Gujarat Cohort
Urvi Budhbhatti, Chaitanya G. Joshi, … Amrutlal K. Patel·bioRxiv·Apr 14, 2022
- Identification of functional non-coding variants affecting Alzheimer's disease risk by Massively Parallel Reporter Assay
Adam D. Hudgins, Hyun-Kyung Chang, … Yousin Suh·bioRxiv·May 5, 2026
- Deciphering the functional impact of Alzheimers Disease-associated variants in resting and proinflammatory immune cells
Marielle L. Bond, Ivana Yoseli Quiroga, … Hyejung Won·medRxiv·Sep 13, 2024