Accuracy of haplotype estimation and whole genome imputation affects complex trait analyses in complex biobanks

Sample recruitment for research consortia, hospitals, biobanks, and personal genomics companies span years, necessitating genotyping in batches, using different technologies. As marker content on genotyping arrays varies systematically, integrating such datasets is non-trivial and its impact on haplotype estimation (phasing) and whole genome imputation, necessary steps for complex trait analysis, remains under-evaluated. Using the iPSYCH consortium dataset, comprising 130,438 individuals, genotyped in two stages, on different arrays, we evaluated phasing and imputation performance across multiple phasing methods and data integration protocols. While phasing accuracy varied both by choice of method and data integration protocol, imputation accuracy varied mostly between data integration protocols. We demonstrate an attenuation in imputation accuracy within samples of non-European origin, highlighting challenges to studying complex traits in diverse populations. Finally, imputation errors can modestly bias association tests and reduce predictive utility of polygenic scores. This is the largest, most comprehensive comparison of data integration approaches in the context of a large psychiatric biobank.