bioRxivMolecular BiologyPreprint
Template switching causes artificial junction formation and false identification of circular RNAs
Chong TangiD, Tian Yu, Yeming XieiD, Zhuqing WangiD, Hayden McSwigginiD, Ying ZhangiD, Huili ZhengiD, Wei YaniD
Abstract
Hundreds of thousands of putative circular RNAs have been identified through deep sequencing and bioinformatic analyses. However, the circularity of these putative RNA circles has not been experimentally validated due to limited methodologies currently available. We reported here that the template-switching capability of commonly used reverse transcriptases (e.g., SuperScript II) leads to the formation of artificial junction sequences, and consequently misclassification of large linear RNAs as RNA circles. Use of reverse transcriptases without terminal transferase activity (e.g., MonsterScript) for cDNA synthesis is critical for the identification of physiological circular RNAs. We also report two methods, MonsterScript junction PCR and high-resolution melting curve analyses, which can reliably distinguish circular RNAs from their linear forms and thus, can be used to discover and validate true circular RNAs.\n\nSignificance StatementThe vast majority of circular RNAs were identified through computational detection of junction sequences in the deep sequencing reads because these unique fusion sequences represent back-splicing events. We found that artificial junction sequences could be formed through template switching (TS) when MMLV-derived reverse transcriptases, e.g., SuperScript II, are used to synthesize cDNAs. Thus, many of the reported circular RNAs may not be RNA circles, but rather experimental artifacts. Fake circular RNAs can be avoided by using reverse transcriptases without terminal transferase activity (e.g., MonsterScript) for cDNA synthesis. We developed two novel methods, MonsterScript junction PCR and high-resolution melting curve analyses, for distinguishing circular RNAs from their linear form.
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 7
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A false sense of circularity: hidden variability in RNase R enzymes confounds reliable circRNA validation
Lotte Ulrix, Jolien H. De Waele, … Tim Lammens·bioRxiv·Oct 14, 2026
- Ularcirc: Visualisation and enhanced analysis of circular RNAs via back and canonical forward splicing
David T. Humphreys, Nicolas Fossat, … Joshua W. K. Ho·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Aug 8, 2019
- ACValidator: a novel assembly-based approach for in silico validation of circular RNAs
Shobana Sekar, Philipp A. Geiger, … Winnie S. Liang·Biology Methods and ProtocolsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2020
- Overexpression-based detection of translatable circular RNAs is vulnerable to coexistent linear RNA byproducts
Yanyi Jiang, Xiaofan Chen, Wei Zhang·Biochemical and Biophysical Research CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Apr 30, 2021
- CircMarker: A Fast and Accurate Algorithm for Circular RNA Detection
Xin Li, Chong Chu, … Yufeng Wu·BMC GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Aug 1, 2018
- Reference-free and de novo Identification of Circular RNAs
Yangmei Qin, Tingting Xu, … Zhi‐Liang Ji·bioRxiv·Apr 21, 2020