BRCA1 and ELK-1 regulate Neural Progenitor Cell Fate in the Optic Tectum in response toVisual Experience in Xenopus laevis tadpoles
Lin-Chien Huang, Caroline R. McKeowniD, Hai‐yan HeiD, Aaron C. Ta, Hollis T. ClineiD
Abstract
In developing Xenopus tadpoles, the optic tectum begins to receive patterned visual input while visuomotor circuits are still undergoing neurogenesis and circuit assembly. This visual input regulates neural progenitor cell fate decisions such that maintaining tadpoles in the dark increases proliferation, expanding the progenitor pool, while visual stimulation promotes neuronal differentiation. To identify regulators of activity-dependent neural progenitor cell fate, we used RNA-Seq to profile the transcriptomes of proliferating neural progenitor cells and newly-differentiated immature neurons. Out of 1,130 differentially expressed (DE) transcripts, we identified six DE transcription factors which are predicted to regulate the majority of the other DE transcripts. Here we focused on Breast cancer 1 (BRCA1) and the ETS-family transcription factor, ELK-1. BRCA1 is known for its role in cancers, but relatively little is known about its potential role in regulating neural progenitor cell fate. ELK-1 is a multifunctional transcription factor which regulates immediate early gene expression. We investigated the effect of BRCA1 and ELK-1 on activity-regulated neurogenesis in the tadpole visual system using in vivo time-lapse imaging to monitor the fate of turbo-GFP-expressing SOX2+ neural progenitor cells in the optic tectum. Our longitudinal in vivo imaging analysis shows that knockdown of either BRCA1 or ELK-1 altered the fates of neural progenitor cells, and furthermore that the effects of visual experience on neurogenesis depend on BRCA1 expression, while the effects of visual experience on neuronal differentiation depend on ELK-1 expression. These studies provide insight into the potential mechanisms by which neural activity affects neural progenitor cell fate.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 9
- FWCI
- 1.13
- Field percentile
- top 29%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Ptbp1 is not required for retinal neurogenesis and cell fate specification.
Haley Appel, Rogger P. Carmen‐Orozco, … Seth Blackshaw·eLifePeer-reviewed·Dec 4, 2025
- Optic nerve innervation promotes Wnt/b-catenin pathway activity and progenitor cell proliferation in the zebrafish optic tectum
Olivia L. Hagen, Yehyun Kim, … Kara L. Cerveny·bioRxiv·Jun 19, 2026
- BRG1 establishes the neuroectodermal chromatin landscape to restrict dorsal cell fates
Jackson A. Hoffman, Ginger W. Muse, … Trevor Archer·Science AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Mar 1, 2024
- Cis-regulatory analysis of Onecut1 expression in fate-restricted retinal progenitor cells
Sruti Patoori, Nathalie Jean-Charles, … Mark M. Emerson·Neural DevelopmentPeer-reviewed·Mar 19, 2020
- In vivo time-lapse imaging of cell proliferation and differentiation in the optic tectum of Xenopus laevis tadpoles
Martin Sihan Feng, Maggie R. Kettelberger, Jennifer E. Bestman·bioRxiv·Jul 31, 2023
- Retinal input influences pace of neurogenesis but not cell-type configuration of the visual forebrain
Shachar Sherman, Irene Arnold-Ammer, … Herwig Baier·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Sep 27, 2023