bioRxivGenomicsPreprint
Robust and accessible in situ sequencing with an open-source automated sequencer
Aixin ZhangiD, Zoe MaltzeriD, Jacob Lapka, Sabrina ChengiD, Alan Guthrie, Cliff SlaughterbeckiD, Angela Y. FaniD, Neha GoswamiiD, Mara C.P. RueiD, Maryam MajeediD, Dennis M. Maharjan, Jeanelle ArizaiD, Angela P. AyalaiD, Madeleine Bixby, Cory T. Dickson, Sam HastingsiD, Alvin HuangiD, Tulip E. Tulip E. O'NeilliD, Alana A. OyamaiD, Caleb ShiiD, Jack WatersiD, Yi-Chen Wu, Renae GalluccioiD, Huiqing ZhaniD, James A. BourneiD, , Xiaoyin CheniD
- Citations
- 0
Abstract
Targeted in situ sequencing underlies many spatial transcriptomic, barcoded connectomic, and multiplexed perturbation techniques. Each experiment requires many cycles of chemical reactions and imaging that are time-consuming and error-prone to perform manually, and few commercial platforms can sequence highly diverse RNA barcodes in situ at cellular resolution across large tissue sections. Here we present Seq-o-Matic, an open-source automated in situ sequencer built entirely from commercially available components, which integrates fluidics, heated incubation, and imaging of up to three continuous 18 mm x 50 mm areas on standard microscope slides. Relative to manual sequencing, Seq-o-Matic reduced hands-on time 6- to 17.5-fold and total run time about 2.6-fold. Across three runs spanning two mouse strains and a neonatal marmoset, sequencing quality, measured by signal retention, channel specificity, and phasing, was similar to that of four manually sequenced mouse brains. In four mouse hemispheres sequenced in separate runs (two C57BL/6J, one NOD, and one WSB), consensus cell types were present in every brain and corresponded to those of a manually sequenced C57BL/6J brain. Within cortical excitatory neurons, the two C57BL/6J brains were more similar to each other than were brains of different strains, suggesting that technical variation between runs was small relative to strain differences. Seq-o-Matic thus makes consistent, high-throughput in situ sequencing accessible to laboratories without specialized in situ sequencing expertise.
- organism: mouse
- assay: spatial transcriptomics
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: database / resource
- research focus: software / tool
- approach: experimental assay
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Efficient in situ barcode sequencing using padlock probe-based BaristaSeq
Xiaoyin Chen, Yu-Chi Sun, … Anthony M. Zador·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Nov 26, 2017
- Matrix-seq: An adjustable-resolution spatial transcriptomics via microfluidic matrix-based barcoding.
- Hybridization-based In Situ Sequencing (HybISS): spatial transcriptomic detection in human and mouse brain tissue
Daniel Gyllborg, Christoffer Mattsson Langseth, … Mats F. Nilsson·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Sep 11, 2020
- Expansion Sequencing: Spatially Precise In Situ Transcriptomics in Intact Biological Systems
Shahar Alon, Daniel Goodwin, … Kirsty Sawicka·SciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 28, 2021
- PySeq2500: An open source toolkit for repurposing HiSeq 2500 sequencing systems as versatile fluidics and imaging platforms.
Kunal Pandit, Joana Petrescu, … Silas Maniatis·bioRxiv·Aug 27, 2021
- Seq-Scope: Submicrometer-resolution spatial transcriptomics for single cell and subcellular studies