bioRxivBiochemistryPreprint
Interlaboratory comparison of standardised metabolomics and lipidomics analyses in human and rodent blood using the MxP(R) Quant 500 kit
Gözde Ertürk ZararsıziD, Jutta LintelmanniD, Alexander CeciliD, Jennifer KirwaniD, Gernot PoschetiD, Hagen M. GegneriD, Sven SchuchardtiD, Xue Li GuaniD, Daisuke SaigusaiD, David Scott WishartiD, Jiamin ZhengiD, Rupasri Mandal, Kendra J. Adams, J. Will ThompsoniD, Michael P. SnyderiD, Kévin ContrepoisiD, Songjie CheniD, Nadia Ashrafi, Sümeyya AkyoliD, Ali YılmaziD, Stewart Francis GrahamiD, Thomas M. O’ConnelliD, Karel KaleckýiD, Teodoro BottiglieriiD, Alice LimoncieliD, , Gabi KastenmülleriD
- Citations
- 10
Abstract
Metabolomics and lipidomics are pivotal in understanding phenotypic variations beyond genomics. However, quantification and comparability of mass spectrometry (MS)-derived data are challenging. Standardised assays can enhance data comparability, enabling applications in multi-center epidemiological and clinical studies. Here we evaluated the performance and reproducibility of the MxP(R) Quant 500 kit across 14 laboratories. The kit allows quantification of 634 different metabolites from 26 compound classes using triple quadrupole MS. Each laboratory analysed twelve samples, including human plasma and serum, lipaemic plasma, NIST SRM 1950, and mouse and rat plasma, in triplicates. 505 out of the 634 metabolites were measurable above the limit of detection in all laboratories, while eight metabolites were undetectable in our study. Out of the 505 metabolites, 412 were observed in both human and rodent samples. Overall, the kit exhibited high reproducibility with a median coefficient of variation (CV) of 14.3 %. CVs in NIST SRM 1950 reference plasma were below 25 % and 10 % for 494 and 138 metabolites, respectively. To facilitate further inspection of reproducibility for any compound, we provide detailed results from the in-depth evaluation of reproducibility across concentration ranges using Deming regression. Interlaboratory reproducibility was similar across sample types, with some species-, matrix-, and phenotype-specific differences due to variations in concentration ranges. Comparisons with previous studies on the performance of MS-based kits (including the AbsoluteIDQ p180 and the Lipidyzer) revealed good concordance of reproducibility results and measured absolute concentrations in NIST SRM 1950 for most metabolites, making the MxP(R) Quant 500 kit a relevant tool to apply metabolomics and lipidomics in multi-center studies.
- organism: human
- organism: mouse
- organism: rat
- assay: metabolomics
- assay: metagenomics
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Quartet metabolite reference materials for assessing inter-laboratory reliability and data integration of metabolomic profiling
Naixin Zhang, Peipei Zhang, … Leming M. Shi·bioRxiv·Nov 1, 2022
- Validation and automation of a high-throughput multi-targeted method for semi-quantification of endogenous metabolites from different biological matrices using tandem mass spectrometry
J. Nandania, G. Peddinti, … V. Velagapudi·bioRxiv·Jun 20, 2018
- A scalable approach to absolute quantitation in metabolomics
Luke S. Ferro, Alan Y. L. Wong, … Jennifer M. Campbell·bioRxiv·Sep 9, 2024
- Meta-analysis of targeted metabolomics data from heterogeneous biological samples provides insights into metabolite dynamics
Ho‐Joon Lee, Daniel M. Kremer, … Costas Andreas Lyssiotis·MetabolomicsPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2019
- The unknown lipids project: harmonized methods improve compound identification and data reproducibility in an inter-laboratory untargeted lipidomics study
Tong Shen, Ciara Conway, … Charles R. Evans·bioRxiv·Feb 1, 2023
- Concepts and Software Package for Efficient Quality Control in Targeted Metabolomics Studies - MeTaQuaC
Mathias Kuhring, Alina Eisenberger, … Dieter Beule·Analytical ChemistryPeer-reviewed·Jun 30, 2020