A framework for evaluating edited cell libraries created by massively parallel genome engineering
Simon E. CawleyiD, Eric AbbateiD, Christopher G. Abraham, Steven Alvarez, Mathew BarberiD, Scott BolteiD, Jocelyne BruandiD, Deanna M. ChurchiD, Clint Davis, Matthew EstesiD, Stephen Federowicz, Richard J. FoxiD, Miles W. GanderiD, Andrew D. GarstiD, Gozde GenceriD, Andrea L. Halweg‐EdwardsiD, Paul Hardenbol, Thomas H. HrahaiD, Surbhi JainiD, Charlie Johnson, Kara JuneauiD, Nandini KrishnamurthyiD, Shea Lambert, Bryan A. Leland, Francesca S. Pearson, , Michael S. Graige
Abstract
Genome engineering methodologies are transforming biological research and discovery. Approaches based on CRISPR technology have been broadly adopted and there is growing interest in the generation of massively parallel edited cell libraries. Comparing the libraries generated by these varying approaches is challenging and researchers lack a common framework for defining and assessing the characteristics of these libraries. Here we describe a framework for evaluating massively parallel libraries of edited genomes based on established methods for sampling complex populations. We define specific attributes and metrics that are informative for describing a complex cell library and provide examples for estimating these values. We also connect this analysis to generic phenotyping approaches, using either pooled (typically via a selection assay) or isolate (often referred to as screening) phenotyping approaches. We approach this from the context of creating massively parallel, precisely edited libraries with one edit per cell, though the approach holds for other types of modifications, including libraries containing multiple edits per cell (combinatorial editing). This framework is a critical component for evaluating and comparing new technologies as well as understanding how a massively parallel edited cell library will perform in a given phenotyping approach.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 2
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- NANOCUTSIGHT: A NANOPORE-SEQUENCING APPROACH AND ANALYSIS PIPELINE TO ASSESS GENOME EDITING EFFICACY IN VARIOUS CELL POPULATIONS
Danny Bergeron, Véronique Gaudreault, … Steve Jean·bioRxiv·Sep 8, 2026
- A resource and computational approach for quantifying gene editing allelism at single-cell resolution
Matthew H. Ung, Gabriella Angelini, … Huanying Gary Ge·bioRxiv·May 22, 2025
- Optimized CRISPR guide RNA library cloning reduces skew and enables more compact genetic screens
Seok‐Jin Heo, Lauren D. Enriquez, … Eric D. Chow·bioRxiv·Dec 22, 2022
- Genome-Wide CRISPR Screening Identifies Cellular Factors Controlling Nonviral Genome Editing Efficiency
Shivani Saxena, Meha Kabra, … Krishanu Saha·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Aug 13, 2026
- Pooled CRISPR screening with single-cell transcriptome read-out
Paul Datlinger, André F. Rendeiro, … Christoph Bock·Nature MethodsPeer-reviewed·Jan 18, 2017
- Genome Editing Is Induced in a Binary Manner in Single Human Cells
G. Takahashi, D. Kondo, … Y. Miyaoka·bioRxiv·Mar 4, 2022