henhaobio
Sign in

Journal of Proteome ResearchCancer BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article

MR-SP2: A Microreactor for Upward Pressure-Catapulting Laser Microdissection for Mass Spectrometry-Based Spatial Proteomics at Single-Cell Resolution

Manuel MetzgeriD, Maximilian MaldackeriD, Tobias HutzenlaubiD, Nils PaustiD, Oliver SchillingiD, Jan-Niklas KlattiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Laser capture microdissection (LCM) combined with liquid chromatography-tandem mass-spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) enables spatially resolved proteomics at few-cell scale, yet losses from minute LCM-cut specimens, particularly with upward pressure-catapulting systems and subsequent processing, limit depth and reproducibility. We present MR-SP{superscript 2} (Microreactor-based Sample Preparation for Spatial Proteomics), a one-pot-in-solution workflow that integrates reproducible LCM-cut specimen capture, processing with minimized adsorptive losses, and pipetting-free transfer with Evotip disposable precolumns. The workflow is demonstrated on a formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) murine kidney using upward pressure-catapulting LCM for targeted isolation of defined tissue specimens. Across 50,000 {micro}m3 regions (22 cells), MR-SP{superscript 2} modestly improved proteome coverage (3,381 {+/-} 80 versus 3,174 {+/-} 59 proteins). Decreasing sample input further accentuated the advantage of MR-SP{superscript 2} in maintaining higher identification rates, highlighting the successful reduction of adsorptive losses of the MR-SP{superscript 2} workflow. At 12,500 {micro}m3 (5-6 cells), identifications increased to 1,145 {+/-} 188 versus 302 {+/-} 126. At 3,125 {micro}m3 (1-2 cells), identifications reached 695 {+/-} 112 versus 206 {+/-} 51. MR-SP{superscript 2} improves identification depth for few-cell FFPE samples nearly threefold and provides an LCM-compatible preparation that expands the robustness, applicability of upward pressure-catapulting LCM within the spatial proteomics toolkit.

Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
Field percentile
14th percentile

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.