Climbing up and down binding landscapes: a high-throughput study of mutational effects in homologous protein-protein complexes
M. Heyne, J. Shirian, I. Cohen, Y. Peleg, E. S. Radisky, N. Papo, J. M. Shifman
Abstract
Each protein-protein interaction (PPI) has evolved to possess binding affinity that is compatible with its cellular function. As such, cognate enzyme/inhibitor interactions frequently exhibit very high binding affinities, while structurally similar non-cognate PPIs possess substantially weaker binding affinities. To understand how slight differences in sequence and structure could lead to drastic changes in PPI binding free energy ({Delta}{Delta}Gbind), we study three homologous PPIs that span nine orders of magnitude in binding affinity and involve a serine protease interacting with an inhibitor BPTI. Using state-of-the-art methodology that combines protein randomization and affinity sorting coupled to next-generation sequencing and data normalization, we report quantitative binding landscapes consisting of {Delta}{Delta}Gbind values for the three PPIs, gleaned from tens of thousands of single and double mutations in the BPTI binding interface. We demonstrate that the three homologous PPIs possess drastically different binding landscapes and lie at different points in respect to the landscape maximum. Furthermore, the three PPIs demonstrate distinct patterns of coupling energies between two simultaneous mutations that depend not only on positions involved but also on the nature of the mutation. Interestingly, we find that in all three PPIs positive epistasis is frequently observed at hot-spot positions where mutations lead to loss of high affinity, while conversely negative epistasis is observed at cold-spot positions, where mutations lead to affinity enhancement. The new insights on PPI evolution revealed in this study will be invaluable in understanding evolution of other biological complexes and can greatly facilitate design of novel high-affinity protein inhibitors. SignificanceProtein-protein interactions (PPIs) have evolved to display binding affinities that can support their function. As such, cognate and non-cognate PPIs could be highly similar structurally but exhibit huge differences in binding affinities. To understand this phenomenon, we studied the effect of tens of thousands of single and double mutations on binding affinity of three homologous protease-inhibitor complexes. We show that binding landscapes of the three complexes are strikingly different and depend on the PPI evolutionary optimality. We observe different patterns of couplings between mutations for the three PPIs with negative and positive epistasis appearing most frequently at hot-spot and cold-spot positions, respectively. The evolutionary trends observed here are likely to be universal to all biological complexes in the cell.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Generating quantitative binding landscapes through fractional binding selections, deep sequencing and data normalization
M. Heyne, N. Papo, J. Shifman·bioRxiv·Jan 3, 2019
- A complete map of specificity encoding enables reprogramming of a protein interaction
Taraneh Zarin, Cristina Hidalgo-Carcedo, Ben Lehner·bioRxiv·Apr 25, 2024
- A rugged binding landscape unifies static and dynamic paradigms in protein-protein interactions
Te Liu, Sichao Huang, … Bin Sun·bioRxiv·Sep 4, 2026
- ProBASS: a language model with sequence and structural features for predicting the effect of mutations on binding affinity
Sagara N.S. Gurusinghe, Yibing Wu, … Julia M. Shifman·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2025
- Mapping the diverse topologies of protein-protein interaction fitness landscapes
Shannon S. Lu, Matthew J. Styles, … Bryan C. Dickinson·bioRxiv·Oct 14, 2025
- The genetic architecture of protein interaction affinity and specificity
Alexandra M. Bendel, André J. Faure, … Guillaume Diss·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Oct 14, 2024