How enhancers regulate wavelike gene expression patterns: Novel enhancer prediction and live reporter systems identify an enhancer associated with the arrest of pair-rule waves in the short-germ beetle Tribolium
Christine MauiD, Heike Rudolf, Frederic StrobliD, Benjamin SchmidiD, Timo Regensburger, Ralf PalmisanoiD, Ernst H. K. StelzeriD, Leila TaheriD, Ezzat El‐SherifiD
Abstract
A key problem in development is to understand how genes turn on or off at the right place and right time during embryogenesis. Such decisions are made by non-coding sequences called enhancers. Much of our models of how enhancers work rely on the assumption that genes are activated de novo as stable domains across embryonic tissues. Such view has been strengthened by the intensive landmark studies of the early patterning of the anterior-posterior (AP) axis of the Drosophila embryo, where indeed gene expression domains seem to arise more or less stably. However, careful analysis of gene expressions in other model systems (including the AP patterning in vertebrates and short-germ insects like the beetle Tribolium castaneum) painted a different, very dynamic view of gene regulation, where genes are oftentimes expressed in a wavelike fashion. How such gene expression waves are mediated at the enhancer level is so far unclear. Here we establish the AP patterning of the short-germ beetle Tribolium as a model system to study dynamic and temporal pattern formation at the enhancer level. To that end, we established an enhancer prediction system in Tribolium based on time- and tissue-specific ATAC-seq and an enhancer live reporter system based on MS2 tagging. Using this experimental framework, we discovered several Tribolium enhancers, and assessed the spatiotemporal activities of some of them in live embryos. We found our data consistent with a model in which the timing of gene expression during embryonic pattern formation is mediated by a balancing act between enhancers that induce rapid changes in gene expressions (that we call dynamic enhancers) and enhancers that stabilizes gene expressions (that we call static enhancers).
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 18
- FWCI
- 1.60
- Field percentile
- top 17%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Enhancer identification and activity evaluation in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum
Yi‐Ting Lai, Kevin D. Deem, … Yoshinori Tomoyasu·DevelopmentPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2018
- High-multiplexity imaging reveals that temporal-to-spatial patterning of embryonic structures can involve active transformation of temporal information rather than direct mapping
Jimena Garcia-Guillen, Mahla Ahmadi, … Ezzat El‐Sherif·bioRxiv·Jun 1, 2026
- Dynamic regulation of anterior-posterior patterning genes in living Drosophila embryos
Takashi Fukaya·Current BiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 23, 2021
- Dynamic modulation of enhancer responsiveness by core promoter elements in living Drosophila embryo
Moe Yokoshi, Koji Kawasaki, … Takashi Fukaya·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Nov 12, 2021
- Core promoters restrict pleiotropic enhancer inputs to achieve spatiotemporal specificity in gene expression
Margarita Masoura, Deevitha Balasubramanian, … Yad Ghavi-Helm·bioRxiv·Sep 23, 2025
- Shadow enhancers enable Hunchback bifunctionality in the Drosophila embryo
Max Staller, Ben J. Vincent, … Angela DePace·bioRxiv·Jan 3, 2015