RNAMolecular BiologyPeer-reviewed journal article
A piggyBac-based toolkit for inducible genome editing in mammalian cells
Megan D. SchertzeriD, Eliza ThulsoniD, Keean C. A. BracerosiD, David M. LeeiD, Emma R. HinkleiD, Ryan M. MurphyiD, Susan O. KimiD, Eva C.M. VitucciiD, J. Mauro CalabreseiD
Abstract
We describe the development and application of a novel series of vectors that facilitate CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing in mammalian cells, which we call CRISPR-Bac. CRISPR-Bac leverages the piggyBac transposon to randomly insert CRISPR-Cas9 components into mammalian genomes. In CRISPR-Bac, a single piggyBac cargo vector containing a doxycycline-inducible Cas9 or catalytically-dead Cas9 (dCas9) variant and a gene conferring resistance to Hygromycin B is co-transfected with a plasmid expressing the piggyBac transposase. A second cargo vector, expressing a single-guide RNA (sgRNA) of interest, the reverse-tetracycline TransActivator (rtTA), and a gene conferring resistance to G418, is also cotransfected. Subsequent selection on Hygromycin B and G418 generates polyclonal cell populations that stably express Cas9, rtTA, and the sgRNA(s) of interest. Using Mus musculus-derived embryonic and trophoblast stem cells, we show that CRISPR-Bac can be used to knockdown proteins of interest, to create targeted genetic deletions with high efficiency, and to activate or repress transcription of protein-coding genes and an imprinted long noncoding RNA. The ratio of sgRNA-to-Cas9-to-transposase can be adjusted in transfections to alter the average number of cargo insertions into the genome. sgRNAs targeting multiple genes can be inserted in a single transfection. CRISPR-Bac is a versatile platform for genome editing that simplifies the generation of mammalian cells that stably express the CRISPR-Cas9 machinery.
- organism: mouse
- assay: CRISPR screen
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: variant calling
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 44
- FWCI
- 1.24
- Field percentile
- top 22%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Parallelized engineering of mutational models using piggyBac transposon delivery of CRISPR libraries
Xander Nuttle, Nicholas D. Burt, … Michael E. Talkowski·bioRxiv·Jul 10, 2020
- Multiplexed and Inducible Gene Modulation in Human Pluripotent Stem Cells by CRISPR Interference and Activation
Dane Z. Hazelbaker, Amanda Beccard, … Lindy E. Barrett·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jan 20, 2020
- Improvement of baculovirus as protein expression vector and as biopesticide by CRISPR/Cas9 editing
V. Pazmino-Ibarra, A. Mengual, … S. Herrero·bioRxiv·Jun 6, 2019
- Site-specific integration of transposon via engineered piggyBac transposase
Naiqing Xu, Lei Han, … Xiaoyang Wu·bioRxiv·Jan 21, 2026
- A simple and highly efficient method for multi-allelic CRISPR-Cas9 editing in primary cell cultures
P. Hoellerbauer, M. Kufeld, … P. PADDISON·bioRxiv·Jul 1, 2020
- Gene editing in bacteria via SpCas9/sgRNA ribonucleoprotein complexes
Ruben Dario Arroyo-Olarte, Ricardo Bravo Rodríguez, Edgar Morales‐Ríos·bioRxiv·Jun 21, 2021