Parallelized engineering of mutational models using piggyBac transposon delivery of CRISPR libraries
Xander NuttleiD, Nicholas D. BurtiD, Benjamin CurralliD, Mariana Moyses-Oliveira, Kiana MohajeriiD, Rachita YadaviD, Derek J.C. TaiiD, James F. GusellaiD, Michael E. TalkowskiiD
Abstract
Novel gene and variant discoveries have reached unprecedented scale with the emergence of exome and genome sequencing studies across a spectrum of human disease initiatives. Highly parallelized functional characterization of these variants is now paramount to deciphering disease mechanisms, and approaches that facilitate editing of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) to derive otherwise inaccessible tissues of interest (e.g., brain) have become critical in genomics research. Here, we sought to facilitate scalable editing of multiple genes and variants by developing a genome engineering approach that incorporates libraries of CRISPR/Cas9 guide RNAs (gRNAs) into a piggyBac (PB) transposon system. To test the efficiency of inducing small indels, targeted deletions, and large reciprocal copy number variants (CNVs), we simultaneously delivered to human iPSCs both Cas9 and a library including 59 single gRNAs targeting segmental duplications, 70 paired gRNAs flanking particular genic regions, and three single gRNAs targeting the coding sequence of an individual gene, MAGEL2. After editing, we isolated single cells, expanded resultant colonies, and genotyped their gRNA contents and mutational outcomes. We observed that 97.7% of gRNA constructs were integrated into at least one colony, with 85.6% of colonies containing three or fewer PB integrations. This PB editing method generated 354 cell lines with 57.8% of sequenced gRNA cleavage sites modified in at least one line, 14.4% of these lines altered at multiple targets, and single-copy indel mutagenesis predominating. Among the edits generated were eight targeted genomic deletions, including pathogenic microdeletions at chromosome 15q11-q13 ([~]5.3 Mbp), chromosome 16p11.2 ([~]740 kbp), and chromosome 17q11.2 ([~]1.4 Mbp). These data highlight PB editing as a powerful platform for gene inactivation and testify to its strong potential for oligogenic modeling. The ability to rapidly establish high-quality mutational models at scale will facilitate the development of near-isogenic cellular collections and catalyze comparative functional genomic studies, better positioning us to investigate the roles of hundreds of genes and mutations in development and disease.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A piggyBac-based toolkit for inducible genome editing in mammalian cells
Megan D. Schertzer, Eliza Thulson, … J. Mauro Calabrese·RNAPeer-reviewed·May 17, 2019
- Site-specific integration of transposon via engineered piggyBac transposase
Naiqing Xu, Lei Han, … Xiaoyang Wu·bioRxiv·Jan 21, 2026
- Precision genome-editing with CRISPR/Cas9 in human induced pluripotent stem cells
John Budde, Rita J. Martinez, … Celeste M M. Karch·bioRxiv·Sep 12, 2017
- Multiplexed and Inducible Gene Modulation in Human Pluripotent Stem Cells by CRISPR Interference and Activation
Dane Z. Hazelbaker, Amanda Beccard, … Lindy E. Barrett·Scientific ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jan 20, 2020
- Near 100% genome editing efficiency with a one-step all RNA prime editing system in a human reporter iPSC line
Kyle W. Wettschurack, William C. Skarnes, … Yang Yang·bioRxiv·Dec 20, 2024
- CRISPR-Cas9-mediated Large Cluster Deletion and Multiplex Genome Editing in Paenibacillus polymyxa
Meliawati Meliawati, Christa Teckentrup, Jochen Schmid·ACS Synthetic BiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 16, 2021