Ancestry Calibration of Polygenic Risk Scores Improves Risk Stratification and Effect Estimation in African American Adults
Luciana B. VargasiD, Mariah MeyeriD, Iain R. KonigsbergiD, Aastha KakariD, Patrick M. CarryiD, Yun LiiD, Alana C JonesiD, Hemant K. TiwariiD, Vinodh Srinivasasainagendra, Nicole D. ArmstrongiD, Eimear E. KennyiD, Bogdan PaşaniuciD, Marguerite R. IrviniD, Michael H. ChoiD, Maggie A. StanislawskiiD, Sridharan RaghavaniD, Jonathan ShorttiD, Leslie A. LangeiD, Ethan M. LangeiD
Abstract
Polygenic risk score (PRS) distributions vary across populations, complicating PRS risk assessment. We evaluated the impact of post-hoc PRS calibration according to individualized genetic ancestry estimates on PRS performance using two large multi-ethnic PRS for type 2 diabetes (T2D) (PRST2D) and height (PRSheight), in 8,841 African American (AA) individuals from the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study. We calibrated each participants score as a function of estimated genetic similarity to the Yoruba (GSYRI) cohort in the 1000 Genomes Project. Uncalibrated PRSs were significantly skewed by GSYRI. After calibration, 33.6% of individuals in the top decile of PRST2D were reclassified and performance in the top PRST2D decile improved from an OR of 7.97 [6.31-10.13] to 10.77 [8.41- 13.91] when compared to the lowest decile. Similarly, 55.0% of individuals in the top PRSheight decile were reclassified with GSYRI calibration. The calibrated PRSheight showed higher correlation with height (from 0.24 to 0.32, p<10-7), and increased mean height in the top PRSheight decile (p=5.7x10-5) when compared to the uncalibrated PRSheight. Lastly, we show that evaluating uncalibrated PRS while adjusting for GSYRI in regression models can lead to inflated and unstable effect size estimates for both the PRS and GSYRI.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Comparing ancestry calibration approaches for a trans-ancestry colorectal cancer polygenic risk score
Elisabeth A. Rosenthal, Li Hsu, … Gail Pairitz Jarvik·medRxiv·Oct 23, 2023
- The expected polygenic risk score (ePRS) framework: an equitable metric for quantifying polygenetic risk via modeling of ancestral makeup
Yu‐Jyun Huang, Nuzulul Kurniansyah, … Tamar Sofer·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Apr 30, 2026
- Polygenic scores for height in admixed populations
Bárbara Domingues Bitarello, Iain Mathieson·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 2, 2020
- Quantifying factors that affect polygenic risk score performance across diverse ancestries and age groups for body mass index
Daniel J. Hui, Brenda Xiao, … Marylyn DeRiggi Ritchie·Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing (PSB)Peer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2022
- Polygenic risk score portability for common diseases across genetically diverse populations
Sonia Moreno–Grau, Manvi Vernekar, … Carlos D. Bustamante·Human GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2024
- Contextualizing the Utility of Polygenic Risk Scores using Absolute Risk Models in Diverse Ancestry Populations
Martina Fu, Linda Kachuri, … Nilanjan Chatterjee·medRxiv·Jun 4, 2026