Sign in
GenomicsbioRxiv
Preprint

Isoform-level resolution in single-cell CRISPR screens reveals hidden functional consequences of gene perturbation

Nathanael AndrewsiD, Josie GleesoniD, Jasper PanteniD, Sofia ÖlingiD, Sofia LundqvistiD, Tuuli LappalaineniD

Abstract

Single-cell CRISPR screens have enabled systematic investigation of gene function, but studies have largely focused on gene-level effects, overlooking transcriptional complexity and isoform usage. Methods capable of capturing splicing and isoform usage have emerged, including long-read sequencing and alternative library preparation strategies, but their suitability for large-scale perturbation screens remains unevaluated. We compare two library preparation methods (10x Genomics and Parse Biosciences) across Illumina short-read, Oxford Nanopore, and PacBio long-read sequencing, applying CRISPRi to silence three genes with distinct regulatory roles (DDX6, GEMIN5, GFI1B) in K562 cells. While short-read methods detected some splicing events, only long-read sequencing consistently captured isoform-level changes. Although Parse provided even transcript coverage, we observed strong intronic read enrichment, limiting its utility for splicing analysis. The primary constraint of long-read approaches was sequencing depth: [~]21 million reads are needed for 80% saturation of splicing events in a single perturbation. Notably, GEMIN5 knockdown produced only modest differential expression but the most extensive splicing changes, an effect invisible to gene-level analysis, underscoring the value of isoform-level screens. We provide a practical framework for isoform-level analysis in single-cell CRISPR screens, identifying current capabilities and limitations. As perturbation studies scale, long-read sequencing will be essential for comprehensive functional interpretation, capturing biology missed by gene-level analysis. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=49 SRC="FIGDIR/small/737410v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (14K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@14bb963org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@783205org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@11c0233org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d468fe_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.