Isoform-level resolution in single-cell CRISPR screens reveals hidden functional consequences of gene perturbation
Nathanael AndrewsiD, Josie GleesoniD, Jasper PanteniD, Sofia ÖlingiD, Sofia LundqvistiD, Tuuli LappalaineniD
Abstract
Single-cell CRISPR screens have enabled systematic investigation of gene function, but studies have largely focused on gene-level effects, overlooking transcriptional complexity and isoform usage. Methods capable of capturing splicing and isoform usage have emerged, including long-read sequencing and alternative library preparation strategies, but their suitability for large-scale perturbation screens remains unevaluated. We compare two library preparation methods (10x Genomics and Parse Biosciences) across Illumina short-read, Oxford Nanopore, and PacBio long-read sequencing, applying CRISPRi to silence three genes with distinct regulatory roles (DDX6, GEMIN5, GFI1B) in K562 cells. While short-read methods detected some splicing events, only long-read sequencing consistently captured isoform-level changes. Although Parse provided even transcript coverage, we observed strong intronic read enrichment, limiting its utility for splicing analysis. The primary constraint of long-read approaches was sequencing depth: [~]21 million reads are needed for 80% saturation of splicing events in a single perturbation. Notably, GEMIN5 knockdown produced only modest differential expression but the most extensive splicing changes, an effect invisible to gene-level analysis, underscoring the value of isoform-level screens. We provide a practical framework for isoform-level analysis in single-cell CRISPR screens, identifying current capabilities and limitations. As perturbation studies scale, long-read sequencing will be essential for comprehensive functional interpretation, capturing biology missed by gene-level analysis. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=49 SRC="FIGDIR/small/737410v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (14K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@14bb963org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@783205org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@11c0233org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1d468fe_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Single cell characterization of CRISPR-modified transcript isoforms with nanopore sequencing
Heon Seok Kim, Susan M. Grimes, … Hanlee P. Ji·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2021
- Transcriptome-wide profiling of alternative splicing regulators with CRISPore-seq
Simon Müller, Nathanael Andrews, … Neville E. Sanjana·bioRxiv·Nov 25, 2025
- A comparison of long-read single-cell transcriptomic approaches
Anita Scoones, Yuxuan Lan, … Iain C. Macaulay·bioRxiv·Jul 3, 2025
- Scalable single-cell pooled CRISPR screens with conventional knockout vector libraries
Mirazul Islam, Yilin Yang, … Ken S. Lau·bioRxiv·Feb 1, 2024
- Comparative Single-Cell Profiling of CRISPR Knockout and Interference Defines Modality-Specific Strengths in Functional Genomics
Nikhil Gupta, Andy Sayer, … Alex Kalinka·bioRxiv·Aug 27, 2026
- Comprehensive characterization of single cell full-length isoforms in human and mouse with long-read sequencing
Luyi Tian, Jafar S. Jabbari, … Matthew E. Ritchie·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 11, 2021