Journal of Molecular BiologyBiophysicsPeer-reviewed journal article
Robust prediction of relative binding energies for protein-protein complex mutations using free energy perturbation calculations
Jared M. SampsoniD, Daniel A. CannoniD, Jianxin Duan, J. C. K. EpsteiniD, Alina P. SergeevaiD, Phinikoula S. KatsambaiD, Seetha M. Mannepalli, Fabiana A. Bahna, Hélène AdihouiD, Stéphanie M. GuéretiD, Ranganath GopalakrishnaniD, Stefan GeschwindneriD, D. Gareth ReesiD, Anna SigurdardottiriD, Trevor C. I. WilkinsoniD, Roger B. DoddiD, Leonardo De MariaiD, Juan Carlos MobareciD, Lawrence S. ShapiroiD, Barry H. HonigiD, Andrew G. BuchananiD, Richard A. FriesneriD, Lingle WangiD
Abstract
Computational free energy-based methods have the potential to significantly improve throughput and decrease costs of protein design efforts. Such methods must reach a high level of reliability, accuracy, and automation to be effectively deployed in practical industrial settings in a way that impacts protein design projects. Here, we present a benchmark study for the calculation of relative changes in protein-protein binding affinity for single point mutations across a variety of systems from the literature, using free energy perturbation (FEP+) calculations. We describe a method for robust treatment of alternate protonation states for titratable amino acids, which yields improved correlation with and reduced error compared to experimental binding free energies. Following careful analysis of the largest outlier cases in our dataset, we assess limitations of the default FEP+ protocols and introduce an automated script which identifies probable outlier cases that may require additional scrutiny and calculates an empirical correction for a subset of charge-related outliers. Through a series of three additional case study systems, we discuss how protein FEP+ can be applied to real-world protein design projects, and suggest areas of further study. Graphical Abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=79 SRC="FIGDIR/small/590325v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (20K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1c5e607org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1810ee5org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1f8f1acorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@c28053_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG HighlightsO_LIReliable calculation of relative binding free energy changes for most protein mutations to within [~]1 kcal/mol. C_LIO_LIAutomated Protein FEP+ Groups treatment of alternate protonation states for titratable residues. C_LIO_LIApplication of FEP+ methodology to "real-world" protein design projects. C_LI
- assay: protein structure
- research focus: drug response / drug discovery
- research focus: protein folding & dynamics
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: deep learning
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 24
- FWCI
- 2.76
- Field percentile
- top 8%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Identifying and overcoming the sampling challenges in relative binding free energy calculations of a model protein:protein complex
I. Zhang, D. A. Rufa, … J. D. Chodera·bioRxiv·Mar 7, 2023
- Implementing and assessing an alchemical method for calculating protein-protein binding free energy
D. Patel, J. S. Patel, F. M. Ytreberg·bioRxiv·Oct 2, 2020
- A functional investigation of antibody Fc-FcRn variant binding guided by *in silico* free energy perturbation methods
Jared M. Sampson, Alina P. Sergeeva, … Richard A. Friesner·Journal of Molecular BiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 10, 2026
- Benchmarking Free Energy Calculations: Analysis of Single and Double Mutations Across Two Simulation Software Platforms for Two Protein Systems
Shivani Gupta, Qinfang Sun, Ronald M. Levy·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Apr 3, 2026
- Prediction of protein mutational free energy: benchmark and sampling improvements increase classification accuracy
- Massively parallel free energy calculations for in silico affinity maturation of designed miniproteins
Dylan Novack, Si Zhang, Vincent A. Voelz·Journal of Chemical Theory and ComputationPeer-reviewed·Aug 16, 2025