bioRxivDevelopmental BiologyPreprint
Mechanistic basis of lineage restriction
Bohou WuiD, Jae Hyun Lee, Kara M. Foshay, Li ZhangiD, Croydon J. Fernandes, Boyang GaoiD, Xiaoyang DouiD, Chris Z. Zhang, Guoping FaniD, Becky X. Xiao, Bruce T. LahniD
Abstract
Lineage restriction is the biological phenomenon where cells lose developmental potency during differentiation for all except their adopted lineages. Lineage restriction is foundational to multicellularity as it secures the functional identities of the myriad cell types in the body. As yet, the mechanisms of lineage restriction remain enigmatic. By developing Potency-Seq to systematically map transcriptional potency of genes across the genome, we uncovered a link between the restriction of developmental potency of cells and the occlusion of transcriptional potency of their genomes. We further showed that, strikingly, genes can undergo irreversible occlusion of their transcriptional potency simply by chromatinization into the nucleosomal form with unmodified histones. These findings led to a comprehensive mechanistic account of lineage restriction as driven by gene occlusion. Specifically, naive pluripotent stem cells at the onset of development possess the unique capacity to erase occlusion globally to reset full transcriptional potency of the genome, which in turn establishes full developmental potency of the cells. Such deocclusion capacity is abolished when cells progress from naive to primed pluripotency. From this stage onward, lineage-inappropriate genes can undergo nucleosome-mediated occlusion in an irreversible manner when their cognate transcription factors (TFs) and/or placeholder factors (PFs) no longer exist in cells to protect them. Consequently, the transcriptionally potent portion of the genome shrinks progressively and irreversibly during differentiation, thus permanently restricting the developmental potency of differentiating cells. ONE-SENTENCE SUMMARYDevelopmental potency of cells is linked to transcriptional potency of their genomes
- assay: bulk RNA-seq
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: trajectory inference
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 0
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Capacity to erase gene occlusion is a defining feature distinguishing naive from primed pluripotency
Kara M. Foshay, Jae Hyun Lee, … Bruce T. Lahn·bioRxiv·May 4, 2021
- Decoupling Transcription from Cell Fate Preserves Germ Cell Totipotency
Sherilyn Grill, Arjuna Rajakumar, … Ruth Lehmann·bioRxiv·Sep 18, 2026
- Dynamic DNA methylation turnover at the exit of pluripotency epigenetically primes gene regulatory elements for hematopoietic lineage specification
Aled Parry, Christel Krueger, … Wolf Reik·bioRxiv·Jan 11, 2023
- Eomes and Brachyury control pluripotency exit and germ layer segregation by changes of chromatin state
Jelena Tošić, Gwang-Jin Kim, … Sebastian J. Arnold·Nature Cell BiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2019
- Mtf2 Safeguards Naïve Pluripotency by Restricting Trophectoderm Competence
Seong-Min Kim, S-A Lim, … Hyuk‐Jin Cha·bioRxiv·Jun 14, 2026
- Chromatin state barriers enforce an irreversible mammalian cell fate decision
Mario Andres Blanco, David B. Sykes, … Yang Shi·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2021