Nucleic Acids ResearchGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Cruciform-forming AT/TA repeats are acted upon by structure selective endonucleases and Rad51 prior to repositioning to the nuclear periphery for repair
Jan Leendert BoeriD, Sara Crippen, A. C. Kim, Daphne N. KrameriD, Bertrand TheulotiD, Daniel DovratiD, Amir AharoniiD, Duncan J. SmithiD, Catherine H. FreudenreichiD
Abstract
Structure-forming DNA repeats can pose a barrier to DNA replication and repair, creating chromosomal fragile sites. An AT/TA DNA repeat, derived from the Flex1 region of human common fragile site FRA16D, can form hairpin and cruciform structures which interfere with DNA replication. When inserted into the S. cerevisiae genome, the Flex1(AT)34 repeat stimulates chromosome deletions in a manner dependent on the Mus81-Mms4 nuclease and the SLX4 nuclease scaffold. It was previously found that hairpin forming CAG/CTG repeats move to the nuclear periphery to maintain genomic stability. Here, we show that a structure forming AT/TA repeat also relocalizes to the nuclear periphery in late S/G2 phase in a replication and length-dependent manner. In contrast to the CAG repeat, this shift in nuclear positioning is dependent on polySUMOylation and the activity of the Mus81-Mms4 nuclease. Processing by the Mre11 nuclease and Rad51-dependent strand exchange occurs prior to repositioning. Replication analysis indicates that the replisome likely bypasses the AT/TA repeat leaving behind a DNA structure that initiates relocation to the nuclear periphery. We conclude that AT/TA repeats form post-replicative DNA structures that are targeted for nuclease cleavage and require hairpin processing and repositioning to the nuclear periphery for homologous recombination-dependent repair.
- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.16
- Field percentile
- top 7%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Structure-forming CAG/CTG repeats interfere with gap repair to cause repeat expansions and chromosome breaks
Erica J. Polleys, Isabella S. Del Priore, … Catherine H. Freudenreich·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Apr 29, 2023
- The DNA Replication Checkpoint Targets the Kinetochore for Relocation of Collapsed Forks to the Nuclear Periphery
Tyler M. Maclay, Jenna M. Whalen, … Catherine H. Freudenreich·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jul 30, 2025
- Structures of 9-1-1 DNA checkpoint clamp loading at gaps from start to finish and ramification to biology
F. Zheng, R. E. Georgescu, … H. Li·bioRxiv·May 3, 2023
- Homologous recombination induced by a replication fork barrier requires cooperation between strand invasion and strand annealing activities
Léa Marie, Lorraine S. Symington·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jan 10, 2022
- Saccharomyces cerevisiae H2A copies differentially contribute to recombination and CAG/CTG repeat maintenance, with a role for H2A.1 threonine 126
Nealia C. M. House, Erica J. Polleys, … Catherine H. Freudenreich·eLifePeer-reviewed·Dec 5, 2019
- The nuclear structural protein NuMA is required for efficient DNA replication by ensuring association of core replication factors to replication forks
Zhen-Guo Wang, Sara Knowles, … Weihang Chai·DNA repairPeer-reviewed·Jul 2, 2026