Spatiotemporal limits of optogenetic manipulations in cortical circuits
Nuo LiiD, Susu CheniD, Zengcai V. GuoiD, Han CheniD, Yan Huo, H. InagakiiD, Courtney Davis, David HanseliD, Caiying Guo, Karel SvobodaiD
Abstract
Neuronal inactivation is commonly used to assess the involvement of groups of neurons in specific brain functions. Optogenetic tools allow manipulations of genetically and spatially defined neuronal populations with excellent temporal resolution. However, the targeted neurons are coupled with other neural populations over multiple length scales. As a result, the effects of localized optogenetic manipulations are not limited to the targeted neurons, but produces spatially extended excitation and inhibition with rich dynamics. Here we benchmarked several optogenetic silencers in transgenic mice and with viral gene transduction, with the goal to inactivate excitatory neurons in small regions of neocortex. We analyzed the effects of the perturbations in vivo using electrophysiology. Channelrhodopsin activation of GABAergic neurons produced more effective photoinhibition of pyramidal neurons than direct photoinhibition using light-gated ion pumps. We made transgenic mice expressing the light-dependent chloride channel GtACR under the control of Cre-recombinase. Activation of GtACR produced the most potent photoinhibition. For all methods, localized photostimuli produced photoinhibition that extended substantially beyond the spread of light in tissue, although different methods had slightly different resolution limits (radius of inactivation, 0.5 mm to 1 mm). The spatial profile of photoinhibition was likely shaped by strong coupling between cortical neurons. Over some range of photostimulation, circuits produced the \"paradoxical effect\", where excitation of inhibitory neurons reduced activity in these neurons, together with pyramidal neurons, a signature of inhibition-stabilized neural networks. The offset of optogenetic inactivation was followed by rebound excitation in a light dose-dependent manner, which can be mitigated by slowly varying photostimuli, but at the expense of time resolution. Our data offer guidance for the design of in vivo optogenetics experiments and suggest how these experiments can reveal operating principles of neural circuits.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 11
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- All-Optical Mapping Reveals Distributed Suppression of Cortical Sensory Responses After Optogenetic Silencing
Manuel Ambrosone, Elena Montagni, … Anna Letizia Allegra Mascaro·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Jul 8, 2025
- Optogenetic stimulation recruits cortical neurons in amorphology-dependent manner
David Berling, Luca Baroni, … Ján Antolík·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Oct 18, 2024
- High Current Optogenetic Channels For Stimulation And Inhibition Of Primary Rat Cortical Neurons
Lei Jin, Eike F. Joest, … Vanessa Maybeck·bioRxiv·Jun 2, 2017
- High-efficiency optogenetic silencing with soma-targeted anion-conducting channelrhodopsins
Mathias Mahn, Lihi Gibor, … Ofer Yizhar·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Oct 2, 2018
- Optical inhibition of zebrafish behavior with anion channelrhodopsins
Gadisti Aisha Mohamed, Ruey‐Kuang Cheng, … Suresh J. Jesuthasan·BMC BiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 3, 2017
- Efficient incorporation of dendrites into a large-scale cortical model reveals their surprising role in sharpening optogenetic responses
David Berling, Tibor Rózsa, … Ján Antolík·bioRxiv·Aug 29, 2025