The density of regulatory information is a major determinant of evolutionary constraint on non-coding DNA in Drosophila
Gonzalo SabarísiD, Daniela M. Ortíz, Ian LaikeriD, Ignacio Mayansky, Sujay NaikiD, Giacomo CavalliiD, David L. SterniD, Ella Preger‐Ben NooniD, Nicolás FrankeliD
Abstract
The density and distribution of regulatory information in non-coding DNA of eukaryotic genomes is largely unknown. Evolutionary analyses have estimated that [~]60% of nucleotides in intergenic regions of the D. melanogaster genome is functionally relevant. This estimate is difficult to reconcile with the commonly accepted idea that enhancers are compact regulatory elements that generally encompass less than 1 kilobase of DNA. Here, we approached this issue through a functional dissection of the regulatory region of the gene shavenbaby (svb). Most of the [~]90 kilobases of this large regulatory region is highly conserved in the genus Drosophila, though characterized enhancers occupy a small fraction of this region. By analyzing the regulation of svb in different contexts of Drosophila development, we found that the regulatory architecture that drives svb expression in the abdominal pupal epidermis is organized in a dramatically different way than the information that drives svb expression in the embryonic epidermis. While in the embryonic epidermis svb is activated by compact and dispersed enhancers, svb expression in the pupal epidermis is driven by large regions with enhancer activity, which occupy a great portion of the svb cis-regulatory DNA. We observed that other developmental genes also display a dense distribution of putative regulatory elements in their regulatory regions. Furthermore, we found that a large percentage of conserved non-coding DNA of the Drosophila genome is contained within putative regulatory DNA. These results suggest that part of the evolutionary constraint on non-coding DNA of Drosophila is explained by the density of regulatory information.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 6
- FWCI
- 0.81
- Field percentile
- top 34%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Dense encoding of developmental regulatory information may constrain evolvability
T. Fuqua, J. Jordan, … J. Crocker·bioRxiv·Apr 17, 2020
- Changes in global repression underlie the evolution of Drosophila abdominal pigmentation
I. D. Mendez-Gonzalez, T. M. Williams, M. Rebeiz·bioRxiv·Sep 9, 2022
- Conserved noncoding transcription and core promoter regulatory code in early Drosophila development
Philippe J. Batut, T Gingeras·eLifePeer-reviewed·Dec 20, 2017
- Functional regulatory evolution outside of the minimal even-skipped stripe 2 enhancer
Justin Crocker, David L. Stern·DevelopmentPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2017
- Repression precedes the stepwise evolution of a highly specific gene expression pattern
- Ultraconserved non-coding DNA within insect phyla
Thomas Brody, Amar Yavatkar, … Ward F. Odenwald·bioRxiv·Jul 11, 2019