Subthreshold perturbation of DNA replication induces a secretory response and a bystander effect in naïve human fibroblasts
Benedetta Perdichizzi, Floriana CappielloiD, Flavia Di Feo, Loredana Le PeraiD, Alfredo PagliucaiD, Pasquale ValenzisiiD, Marco RosinaiD, Daniela Merlo, Annapaola FranchittoiD, Pietro PichierriiD
Abstract
Replication stress is a hallmark of cancer, where it drives DNA damage and genome instability. Yet subtle, subthreshold perturbations of DNA synthesis likely occur routinely in normal proliferating tissues, and their consequences for cell homeostasis are unknown. Using primary human fibroblasts, we show that doses of the DNA polymerase inhibitor aphidicolin, too low to engage the replication checkpoint, or produce detectable DNA breaks, nonetheless elicit low-level, ATM-dependent {gamma}H2AX phosphorylation uncoupled from overt damage. This near-silent perturbation reprograms gene expression, inducing replication-associated genes together with a discrete secretory programme dominated by matrix-remodelling proteases and matricellular factors. This output is not a senescence-associated secretory phenotype: the NF-{kappa}B/IL-1/IL-6 axis is co-ordinately repressed rather than induced, p53 target genes including CDKN1A are unchanged, and cells remain proliferative and non-senescent. Conditioned medium from exposed cells reproduces ATM-{gamma}H2AX activation in naive fibroblasts without DNA damage, defining a "perturbed-replication bystander effect" (PeRBE). PeRBE is ROS-independent and mediated by heat-labile, proteinaceous factors, and in recipient cells it induces an extracellular-matrix programme that culminates in increased collagen production, without loss of proliferative capacity. A perturbation invisible to every standard replication-stress assay therefore generates a transmissible, protein-borne signal that instructs fibrogenic matrix remodelling in cells that never experienced it.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Telomere replication stress-induced DNA damage response triggers inflammatory signaling via canonical and non-canonical STING pathways
Wei Jian Zhu, Yi Gong, … Yie Liu·bioRxiv·Jul 11, 2025
- Non-autonomous induction of epithelial lineage infidelity and hyperplasia by DNA damage
L. Seldin, I. G. Macara·bioRxiv·May 8, 2019
- A FOXO-dependent replication checkpoint restricts proliferation of damaged cells
Marten Hornsveld, Femke M. Feringa, … Boudewijn M.T. Burgering·Cell ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2021
- An adaptive pre-DNA-damage-response protects genome integrity
S. Ragu, G. Matos-Rodrigues, … B. S. Lopez·bioRxiv·May 13, 2020
- Replication fork plasticity upon replication stress requires rapid nuclear actin polymerization
M. D. Palumbieri, C. Merigliano, … M. Lopes·bioRxiv·Mar 24, 2023
- IFI16 senses and protects stalled replication forks
Amelia Gamble, Thomas A. Ward, … Christopher J. Staples·Molecular CellPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026