G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Reliable CRISPR/Cas9 genome engineering in Caenorhabiditis elegans using a single efficient sgRNA and an easily selectable phenotype
Sonia El MouridiiD, Claire LecroiseyiD, Philippe Tardy, Marine MercieriD, Alice Leclercq-Blondel, Nora Zariohi, Thomas BouliniD
Abstract
CRISPR/Cas9 genome engineering strategies allow the directed modification of the C. elegans genome to introduce point mutations, generate knock-out mutants and insert coding sequences for epitope or fluorescent tags. Three practical aspects however complicate such experiments. First, the efficiency and specificity of single-guide RNAs (sgRNA) cannot be reliably predicted. Second, the detection of animals carrying genome edits can be challenging in the absence of clearly visible or selectable phenotypes. Third, the sgRNA target site must be inactivated after editing to avoid further double-strand break events. We describe here a strategy that addresses these complications by transplanting the protospacer of a highly efficient sgRNA into a gene of interest to render it amenable to genome engineering. This sgRNA targeting the dpy-10 gene generates genome edits at comparatively high frequency. We demonstrate that the transplanted protospacer is cleaved at the same time as the dpy-10 gene. Our strategy generates scarless genome edits because it no longer requires the introduction of mutations in endogenous sgRNA target sites. Modified progeny can be easily identified in the F1 generation, which drastically reduces the number of animals to be tested by PCR or phenotypic analysis. Using this strategy, we reliably generated precise deletion mutants, transcriptional reporters, and translational fusions with epitope tags and fluorescent reporter genes. In particular, we report here the first use of the new red fluorescent protein mScarlet in a multicellular organism. wrmScarlet, a C. elegans-optimized version, dramatically surpassed TagRFP-T by showing an 8-fold increase in fluorescence in a direct comparison.
- organism: C. elegans
- assay: CRISPR screen
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: variant calling
- research focus: protein design
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 101
- FWCI
- 4.13
- Field percentile
- top 5%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- High-efficiency CRISPR gene editing in C. elegans using Cas9 integrated into the genome
Matthew L. Schwartz, M. Wayne Davis, … Erik M. Jørgensen·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Nov 8, 2021
- Efficient site-specific editing of the C. elegans genome
Donglei Zhang, Michael Glotzer·bioRxiv·Jul 31, 2014
- Peel-1 negative selection promotes screening-free CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing in Caenorhabditis elegans.
Troy A. McDiarmid, Vinci Au, … Catharine H. Rankin·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Sep 22, 2020
- Effect of Caenorhabditis elegans U6 Promoters on CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Gene Editing Efficiency
Lixiang Feng, Ying Huang, … Wenxing Yang·Peer-reviewed journalPeer-reviewed·Jul 20, 2025
- Robust genome editing with short single-stranded and long, partially single-stranded DNA donors in C. elegans
Gregoriy A. Dokshin, Krishna Sumanth Ghanta, … Craig C. Mello·GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 13, 2018
- Rapid self-selecting and clone free integration of transgenes into engineered CRISPR safe harbor locations in Caenorhabditis elegans
Zachary C. Stevenson, Megan J Moerdyk-Schauwecker, … Patrick C. Phillips·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 19, 2020