henhaobio
Sign in

bioRxivBiophysicsPreprint

The Central Coupler of ClpXP Controls Intersubunit Communication and Couples Intrasubunit Chemical Energy with Force Generation

Robert P. Sosa, Alfredo Jose Florez ArizaiD, JeongHoon KimiD, Alex TongiD, Zhenhui Kang, Alicia Li, John KuriyaniD, Carlos BustamanteiD

PDFDOICodeData

Abstract

ClpX is a clockwise hexameric helical arrangement that hydrolyzes ATP to unfold proteins and translocate them into the proteolytic chamber. We investigate the central coupler, a three -helix module conserved among AAA+ ATPases, which is proposed to enable intersubunit communication and mechanochemical coupling. Although fundamental in AAA+ ATPases, the molecular mechanism underlying these processes remains elusive in ClpX. By combining single-molecule optical tweezers, biochemical assays and single particle cryo-EM we demonstrate that the central coupler, of the second-highest subunit of the ClpX clockwise helical arrangement, positions its Arginine-finger, sensor-I and sensor-II to contact the ATP of the anticlockwise neighbor subunit to trigger its hydrolysis. Then, the central coupler of the highest subunit rapidly couples the ATP hydrolysis with the downward motion of its substrate-translocating loop, enabling fast force generation to swiftly unfold protein substrates while maximizing the thermodynamic efficiency of the motor.

In-depth summary

Claude Opus 5.5 · xhigh effort · 8 Nov 2026 · from the full text of version 2 (8 Oct 2026) · CC BY 4.0

Q208A mutations in up to four subunits of the ClpX central coupler barely slow unfolded-substrate translocation but raise ATP spent per step, weaken force generation and can abolish GFP unfolding.

The central coupler, a three-helix unit shared by AAA+ ATPases, was proposed from deep mutagenesis of the T4 DNA clamp loader to coordinate neighbouring subunits and link ATP hydrolysis to substrate, but how it does so in ClpX was unresolved. Placing the rigidity-breaking Q208A mutation at chosen positions in single-chain ClpX hexamers separates assembly defects from motor function and lets the idea be tested with optical tweezers, ATPase kinetics and cryo-EM.

Key results

  1. ShownWith up to four Q208A subunits, in any arrangement tested, ClpXP translocates unfolded polypeptide at close to wild-type speed with an unchanged step of about 2 nm. Hexamers with one or no wild-type subunit grip the ssrA-tag but do not translocate.

    Mean instantaneous velocity changed only slightly vs WWWWWW across the mutant layouts (e.g. WWWWWW N = 59 traces, WWMMMM N = 47). Mean step stayed at about 2 nm, and longer dwells account for the velocity differences. WMMMMM and MMMMMM formed tethers but did not move even at ~1 pN, and degraded Titin^CM-ssrA poorly in bulk. Pause and backtracking probabilities rose from single to quadruple mutants. · A flexible central coupler does not affect…; The central coupler enables intersubunit…; Figure legends

  2. ShownQ208A speeds up ATP hydrolysis without changing ATP binding, so more ATP is spent per step. The extra cost depends on both how many subunits are mutant and where they sit in the hexamer.

    kcat was similar for WWWWWW and WWWWWM, ~1.5-fold higher for WWWWMM, WWWMWM, WWWMMM and WWMMMM, and ~4-fold higher for WMWMWM. Km scaled linearly with kcat in most constructs, and mant-ATP binding curves were identical for WWWWWW and MMMMMM. ATP per step: ~2 (WWWWWW, WWWWWM), ~3 (WWWMWM, WWWWMM), ~4 (WWWMMM, WWMMMM), ~7 (WMWMWM). · The central coupler enables intersubunit…; Mant-ATP binding and SDS-PAGE degradation essays; Measurement of ATP hydrolysis rate

  3. ShownFull force output needs wild-type central couplers in all six subunits. Hexamers with two or more Q208A subunits unfold GFP less often, even a single mutant unfolds it more slowly, and mutants tolerate less opposing load, while their unloaded speed changes little.

    GFP unfolding probability was ~75% for WWWWWW vs ~45% (WWWWMM, WWWMWM), ~25% (WWMMMM, WWWMMM) and 0 of 54 traces (WMWMWM). The pause before unfolding was ~9 s for WWWWWW vs ~15 s (WWWWWM) and ~21 s (WWWWMM, WWWMWM). F1/2 fell from ~19 pN (WWWWWW) to ~14 pN (WWWWWM) and ~9 pN (WWMMMM), while zero-force speed stayed near ~9 to ~11 nm/s. · The rigidity of the central coupler is essential…; A rigid central coupler determines the maximum…; Figure legends

  4. ShownIn cryo-EM of the alternating WMWMWM mutant, Q208A leaves the substrate-free hexamer unchanged. With substrate bound, the Arg-finger helix, sensor and Walker motifs shift at the A/B, E/F and F/A interfaces, consistent with loss of a hydrogen-bond network anchored by Q208 that links neighbouring subunits.

    Class-I (3.7 Å, no substrate) matches wild-type PDB 8E91 (RMSD 0.83 Å). Class-III (3.4 Å, substrate-bound, ATP regeneration only) resembles PDB 6PP7 (RMSD 1.92 Å), but motifs at those interfaces move 2 to 5 Å. In 6PP7, Q208 of subunit B hydrogen-bonds its own Arg-finger helix, which contacts the Arginine Sensor of subunit A. · Cryo-EM structure of WMWMWM ClpXP complexes; Repositioning of Arg-finger, sensor-I, and…; Cryo-EM data processing; Model Building and Refinement

  5. SuggestedA second substrate-bound class (Class-II), seen only with ATPγS, has ADP in the top subunit and its pore-1 loop extended toward the substrate. The authors read it as a pre-power-stroke state that supports the probabilistic anticlockwise long-step (PA/LS) model: one ATP resets the loop and a second drives the stroke.

    According to the authors, Class-II (3.7 Å in Results, 3.8 Å in Methods) resembles no published ClpXP structure. Its top-subunit Tyr153 sits 5.4 Å from the nearest substrate residue, vs 26.3 Å in Class-III and 10.9 Å in PDB 9C88. Its nucleotide pattern matches PDB 6PP7. The fit to PA/LS is argued by comparison with earlier PDB entries, not tested directly. · Cryo-EM structure of WMWMWM ClpXP complexes; A new ClpXP structure with an extended…; DISCUSSION; Cryo-EM data processing

Methods, data and reproducibility

Single-chain E. coli ClpX hexamers carrying Q208A in defined subunits were tested with dual-trap optical tweezers (translocation, GFP unfolding, force-velocity), NADH-coupled ATPase and mant-ATP binding assays, and SDS-PAGE degradation. The structure of a WMWMWM-ClpP-substrate complex was solved by single-particle cryo-EM.

  • Optical tweezers trajectories of wild-type and Q208A single-chain ClpXP constructs translocating and unfolding Biotin-GFP-(I27-Titin^CM)4-ssrA · E. coli (ClpX, ClpP) · n = e.g. WWWWWW N = 59 traces; 165 GFP unfolding events overall · Zenodo 21879510
  • Cryo-EM movies of WMWMWM ClpXP with ssrA-tagged GFP substrate, under an ATP regeneration system with or without ATPγS · E. coli · n = 12,697 movies (ATP) and 25,584 movies (ATPγS) · EMD-70686/PDB 9OPA; EMD-70772/PDB 9ORD; EMD-70861/PDB 9OTX
  • NADH-coupled ATPase assays at final ATP concentrations from 5 to 10000 µM with saturating Titin^CM-ssrA · E. coli · n = triplicate per ATP concentration
  • SDS-PAGE degradation assays of Titin^CM-ssrA and mant-ATP binding titrations (WWWWWW vs MMMMMM) · E. coli · n = binding points in triplicate
  • Simulated ClpXP translocation traces for validating step finding (3 nm and 4.5 nm noise)
  • Published structures used for comparison: ClpXP entries (e.g. 6PP7, 8E91, 6PP5, 9C88) and the T4 DNA clamp loader · E. coli ClpXP; T4 clamp loader · PDB 6PP7; 8E91; 6PP5; 6PP6; 6PP8; 9C87; 9C88; 8V9R; 6VFS; 6VFX; 3U60
Methods & tools
Dual-trap optical tweezers (1064-nm), Kalafut-Visscher step finding algorithm, NADH-coupled ATPase assay, mant-ATP fluorescence binding assay, Talos Arctica with K3 detector, SerialEM, cryoSPARC v4.4.1, UCSF ChimeraX, COOT, PHENIX, DeepEMhancer, LocScale
Software & environment
cryoSPARC v4.4.1 for cryo-EM processing; custom LabVIEW software for instrument control and custom MATLAB step-finding code (versions not stated).
Reproducibility gaps
Step finding included visual inspection and per-trace tuning of the penalty until under 5% of steps were misidentified, although the statistics section describes an identical automated pipeline for all data.
Limitations (6)
  • Unfolding times for WWWMMM and WWMMMM could not be measured: GFP unfolding took over 5 min, and tethers often broke first. · stated by the authors
  • The ~230 msec β11 refolding time used to explain why mutants fail at unfolding was measured in earlier work at low ATP and is assumed to apply under these conditions. · stated by the authors
  • Class-II was captured only for WMWMWM with ATPγS and a stable substrate. Without ATPγS it was not observed, so the authors presume it is too short-lived to capture in other conditions. · stated by the authors
  • The step-finding penalty and the 1 s pause threshold are arbitrary choices. Pair-wise distribution analysis did not resolve periodicity for the more heavily mutated constructs, and experimenters were not blinded. · stated by the authors
  • Some values differ between sections: WWWMMM F1/2 is given as both ~13 and ~10.3 pN, the Class-II resolution as 3.7 and 3.8 Å, and the interface shifts as 2 to 5 Å and 3 to 7 Å. · noted in this summary
  • Only E. coli ClpX was tested. The closing statement that the results hold for other AAA+ enzymes rests on structural conservation, not on data. · noted in this summary

Read this if you study AAA+ motor mechanochemistry or ClpXP proteolysis and want single-molecule, kinetic and cryo-EM evidence on how contacts between subunits set force output and ATP efficiency.

Citations
1

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.