PLoS BiologyGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article
Multiplex genotyping method to validate the multiallelic genome editing outcomes using machine learning-assisted long-read sequencing
Akihiro KunoiD, Yoshihisa IkedaiD, Shinya AyabeiD, Kanako Kato, Kotaro SakamotoiD, Sayaka SuzukiiD, Kento MorimotoiD, Arata WakimotoiD, Natsuki Mikami, Miyuki IshidaiD, Natsumi Iki, Yuko Hamada, Megumi Takemura, Yoko Daitoku, Yoko TanimotoiD, Tra Thi Huong DinhiD, Kazuya MurataiD, Michito HamadaiD, Masafumi MurataniiD, Atsushi YoshikiiD, Fumihiro SugiyamaiD, Satoru TakahashiiD, Seiya MizunoiD
Abstract
Genome editing can introduce designed mutations into a target genomic site. Recent research has revealed that it can also induce various unintended events such as structural variations, small indels, and substitutions at, and in some cases, away from the target site. These rearrangements may result in confounding phenotypes in biomedical research samples and cause a concern in clinical or agricultural applications. However, current genotyping methods do not allow a comprehensive analysis of diverse mutations for phasing and mosaic variant detection. Here, we developed a genotyping method with an on-target site analysis software named Determine Allele mutations and Judge Intended genotype by Nanopore sequencer (DAJIN) that can automatically identify and classify both intended and unintended diverse mutations, including point mutations, deletions, inversions, and cis double knock-in at single-nucleotide resolution. Our approach with DAJIN can handle approximately 100 samples under different editing conditions in a single run. With its high versatility, scalability, and convenience, DAJIN-assisted multiplex genotyping may become a new standard for validating genome editing outcomes.
- assay: long-read sequencing
- research focus: variant calling
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- approach: machine learning (classical)
- Citations
- 21
- FWCI
- 1.55
- Field percentile
- top 18%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Multi-color droplet digital PCR assay enables allele-specific quantification of heterogeneous genome editing outcomes
Yuga Yasuda, Yuichiro Miyaoka·bioRxiv·Aug 20, 2026
- GREPore-seq: A Robust Workflow to Detect Changes after Gene Editing through Long-range PCR and Nanopore Sequencing
Zi-Jun Quan, Si-Ang Li, … Xiao‐Bing Zhang·Genomics Proteomics & BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 22, 2022
- NANOCUTSIGHT: A NANOPORE-SEQUENCING APPROACH AND ANALYSIS PIPELINE TO ASSESS GENOME EDITING EFFICACY IN VARIOUS CELL POPULATIONS
Danny Bergeron, Véronique Gaudreault, … Steve Jean·bioRxiv·Sep 8, 2026
- EdiTyper: a high-throughput tool for analysis of targeted sequencing data from genome editing experiments
Alexandre Yahi, Paul Hoffman, … Tuuli Lappalainen·bioRxiv·Jul 30, 2020
- Differentiating Genomic SNPs Using Allele Depth and Predicted Genotype
Saam Hasan·bioRxiv·Oct 13, 2018
- CleanFinder: A Scalable Framework for Comprehensive Genome Editing Analysis
Haribaskar Ramachandran, Jochen Dobner, … Andrea Rossi·Trends in biotechnologyPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2026