REV1 Coordinates a Multi-Faceted Tolerance Response to DNA Alkylation Damage and Prevents Chromosome Shattering in Drosophila melanogaster
Varandt Y. KhodaverdianiD, Tokio SanoiD, Lara R. MaggsiD, Gina TomarchioiD, Ana DiasiD, Connor Clairmont, Mai TraniD, Mitch McVeyiD
Abstract
When replication forks encounter damaged DNA, cells utilize DNA damage tolerance mechanisms to allow replication to proceed. These include translesion synthesis at the fork, postreplication gap filling, and template switching via fork reversal or homologous recombination. The extent to which these different damage tolerance mechanisms are utilized depends on cell, tissue, and developmental context-specific cues, the last two of which are poorly understood. To address this gap, we have investigated damage tolerance responses following alkylation damage in Drosophila melanogaster. We report that translesion synthesis, rather than template switching, is the preferred response to alkylation-induced damage in diploid larval tissues. Furthermore, we show that the REV1 protein plays a multi-faceted role in damage tolerance in Drosophila. Drosophila larvae lacking REV1 are hypersensitive to methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) and have highly elevated levels of {gamma}-H2Av foci and chromosome aberrations in MMS-treated tissues. Loss of the REV1 C-terminal domain (CTD), which recruits multiple translesion polymerases to damage sites, sensitizes flies to MMS. In the absence of the REV1 CTD, DNA polymerases eta and zeta become critical for MMS tolerance. In addition, flies lacking REV3, the catalytic subunit of polymerase zeta, require the deoxycytidyl transferase activity of REV1 to tolerate MMS. Together, our results demonstrate that Drosophila prioritize the use of multiple translesion polymerases to tolerate alkylation damage and highlight the critical role of REV1 in the coordination of this response to prevent genome instability. Author SummaryOrganisms have evolved several ways to continue copying their DNA when it is damaged, grouped into the categories of translesion synthesis and template switching. These damage tolerance mechanisms prevent replication forks from collapsing when they encounter DNA damage and prevent catastrophic genome instability and cell death. While the proteins and pathways involved in damage tolerance are beginning to be understood at the single cell level, how they are regulated in multicellular organisms is an intriguing question. In this study, we investigated the mechanisms by which Drosophila tolerate alkylation damage during their development. We discovered that tissues containing rapidly dividing diploid cells favor translesion synthesis over template switching, preferentially utilizing different translesion polymerases in a context-dependent manner. Furthermore, we showed that the REV1 protein, best known for its role in recruiting translesion DNA polymerases to damage sites, performs multiple functions during damage tolerance. Together, our results demonstrate that damage tolerance preferences for multicellular organisms may differ from those observed in cultured cells, and establish Drosophila as a useful model system for studying tolerance mechanisms.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.41
- Field percentile
- top 47%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Post-replicative lesion processing limits DNA damage-induced mutagenesis
Katarzyna H. Masłowska, Ronald P.C. Wong, … Vincent Pagès·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Mar 3, 2025
- Replication intermediate architecture reveals the chronology of DNA damage tolerance pathways at UV-stalled replication forks in human cells
Yann Bénureau, Caroline Pouvelle, … Patricia L Kannouche·bioRxiv·Oct 12, 2020
- Opposing regulation by Rev1 of DNA polymerase zeta activity on damaged versus undamaged DNA
Rachel Bezalel‐Buch, Carrie M. W. Stith, … Peter Burgers·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·May 27, 2026
- Opposite roles of Rad5 in DNA damage tolerance: playing in both error-free and mutagenic lesion bypass
Katarzyna H. Masłowska, Vincent Pagès·Frontiers in Molecular BiosciencesPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2022
- Rad51 filaments assembled in the absence of the complex formed by the Rad51 paralogs Rad55 and Rad57 are outcompeted by translesion DNA polymerases on UV-induced ssDNA gaps
Laurent Maloisel, Émilie Ma, … Eric Coı̈c·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 7, 2023
- DNA Polymerase α has pyrimidine dimer translesion activity that is suppressed during normal replication
Projit Mukherjee, Abheerup Sarker, Grant D. Schauer·bioRxiv·Jul 2, 2025