Dynamic compartmentalization of the pro-invasive transcription factor NHR-67 reveals a role for Groucho in regulating a proliferative-invasive cellular switch in C. elegans
Taylor N. Medwig-KinneyiD, Brian A. KinneyiD, Michael A. Q. MartineziD, Callista Stephanie YeeiD, Sydney S. SirotaiD, Angelina A. MullarkeyiD, Neha SomineniiD, Justin HippleriD, Wan ZhangiD, Kang SheniD, Christopher M. HammelliD, Ariel M. PaniiD, David Q. MatusiD
Abstract
A growing body of evidence suggests that cell division and basement membrane invasion are mutually exclusive cellular behaviors. How cells switch between proliferative and invasive states is not well understood. Here, we investigated this dichotomy in vivo by examining two cell types in the developing Caenorhabditis elegans somatic gonad that derive from equipotent progenitors, but exhibit distinct cell behaviors: the post-mitotic, invasive anchor cell and the neighboring proliferative, non-invasive ventral uterine (VU) cells. We show that the fates of these cells post-specification are more plastic than previously appreciated and that levels of NHR-67 are important for discriminating between invasive and proliferative behavior. Transcription of nhr-67 is downregulated following post-translational degradation of its direct upstream regulator, HLH-2 (E/Daughterless) in VU cells. In the nuclei of VU cells, residual NHR-67 protein is compartmentalized into discrete punctae that are dynamic over the cell cycle and exhibit liquid-like properties. By screening for proteins that colocalize with NHR-67 punctae, we identified new regulators of uterine cell fate maintenance: homologs of the transcriptional co-repressor Groucho (UNC-37 and LSY-22), as well as the TCF/LEF homolog POP-1. We propose a model in which association of NHR-67 with the Groucho/TCF complex suppresses the default invasive state in non-invasive cells, which complements transcriptional regulation to add robustness to the proliferative-invasive cellular switch in vivo.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 5
- FWCI
- 0.36
- Field percentile
- 47th percentile
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Stage-specific transcriptomics of a leader cell reveals cell machineries driving collective invasion
Priti Agarwal, Iska Maimon, … Ronen Zaidel‐Bar·bioRxiv·Sep 29, 2025
- A developmental gene regulatory network for invasive differentiation of the C. elegans anchor cell
Taylor N. Medwig-Kinney, Jayson J. Smith, … David Q. Matus·DevelopmentPeer-reviewed·Dec 5, 2019
- The C. elegans homolog of the Evi1 proto-oncogene, egl-43, coordinates G1 cell cycle arrest with pro-invasive gene expression during anchor cell invasion
Ting Deng, Przemysław Stempor, … Evelyn Lattmann·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 23, 2020
- Cell cycle perturbation uncouples mitotic progression and invasive behavior in a post-mitotic cell
Michael A. Q. Martinez, Chris Z. Zhao, … David Q. Matus·DifferentiationPeer-reviewed·May 1, 2024
- A reevaluation of the relationship between EGL-43 (EVI1/MECOM) and LIN-12 (Notch) during C. elegans anchor cell invasion
Michael A. Q. Martinez, Angelina A. Mullarkey, … David Q. Matus·bioRxiv·Oct 4, 2022
- Essential and dual effects of Notch activity on a natural transdifferentiation event
Thomas Daniele, Jeanne Cury, … Sophie Jarriault·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jan 2, 2025